xml-editor@w3.org from October to December 2003 by subject

4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities of XML 1.0 and XML 1.1

[elharo@metalab.unc.edu: Re: [xml-dev] UTF-8+names]

[NOTE-datetime] extended time formats ±(Y)*YYYY-MM-DD

[simonstl@simonstl.com: Re: [xml-dev] UTF-8+names]

[XML 1.1] Third Edition of 2003?

[xml-dev] Errata E57

[xml-dev] NEL in XML 1.1

[xml-dev] Regd XML algorithms !!

[xml-dev] Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs

[xml-dev] UTF-8+names

Alternate wording in terms of applications and infoset (was Re: Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs)

Comments for PR-xml11-20031105

comments on NEL changes (PR-xml11-20031105)

E55 Substantive

Errata E57

Fran#xE7;ois Yergeau

http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PER-xml-20031030

Missing WFC/BNF production for XML declaration

Possible errata in XML 1.0/1.1 Section 2.3

Process failure in XML 1.1 PR: the control characters are back

Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1

Production 78 in XML 1.1

Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs

Request for PR for XML 1.1

should accept XML 1.0

The XML conformance level that dare not speak its name (was Re: Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs)

Treatment of U+2028

XML 1.1 PR: feedback

XML 1.1 PR: feedback, part 2

XML 1.1 Specification error?

XML1.1 (and 1.0) Descriptive Inconsistency - Section 2.4

Last message date: Thursday, 11 December 2003 15:17:02 UTC