- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:08:32 -0500
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: xml-editor@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
At 8:40 AM -0500 11/5/03, John Cowan wrote: >3) (current) Post errata to a public page; when there are enough, >issue a Proposed Edited Recommendation for public comment. After the >comment period, change what needs changing in the errata list and >issue a new edition of the Recommendation. > So is the current process that errata don't count until a new edition of the recommendation has been issued? That does not seem clear from the various pages. I don't see anything listed as "proposed errata" or "possible errata", just errata. In fact, the XML 1.0 errata page classifies everything on the page as "Known Errors". If it was your intention that these be considered as tentative, the language of the page does not reflect that. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:18:55 UTC