xml-editor@w3.org from October to December 2003 by date

Thursday, 11 December 2003

• 4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities of XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 Carlos Viegas Damásio

Tuesday, 9 December 2003

• Re: [XML 1.1] Third Edition of 2003? François Yergeau

Saturday, 6 December 2003

• Comments for PR-xml11-20031105 Susan Lesch

Monday, 1 December 2003

• Re: XML1.1 (and 1.0) Descriptive Inconsistency - Section 2.4 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Sunday, 30 November 2003

• http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PER-xml-20031030 joseph

Saturday, 29 November 2003

• [XML 1.1] Third Edition of 2003? Ernest Cline

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• XML 1.1 Specification error? David Bond

Monday, 17 November 2003

• XML1.1 (and 1.0) Descriptive Inconsistency - Section 2.4 Glenn A. Adams

Thursday, 13 November 2003

• Treatment of U+2028 Nikolai Grigoriev

Wednesday, 12 November 2003

• comments on NEL changes (PR-xml11-20031105) David Carlisle

Sunday, 9 November 2003

• RE: Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1 Linda DeFina
• Possible errata in XML 1.0/1.1 Section 2.3 Satoshi ISHIKAWA
• Re: Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1 John Cowan
• Re: Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Production 78 / Process failure in XML 1.1 John Cowan
• Process failure in XML 1.1 PR: the control characters are back Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Fran#xE7;ois Yergeau Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Production 78 in XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Missing WFC/BNF production for XML declaration Elliotte Rusty Harold
• should accept XML 1.0 Elliotte Rusty Harold

Friday, 7 November 2003

• XML 1.1 PR: feedback, part 2 ajvincent@juno.com

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• XML 1.1 PR: feedback ajvincent@juno.com

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• Re: [xml-dev] Errata E57 John Cowan
• Re: [xml-dev] Errata E57 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: [xml-dev] Errata E57 John Cowan
• [NOTE-datetime] extended time formats ±(Y)*YYYY-MM-DD Ernest Cline
• Re: [xml-dev] Errata E57 Elliotte Rusty Harold

Saturday, 1 November 2003

• Re: [xml-dev] Errata E57 John Cowan
• E55 Substantive Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Errata E57 Elliotte Rusty Harold

Thursday, 30 October 2003

• The XML conformance level that dare not speak its name (was Re: Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs) Rick Jelliffe

Wednesday, 29 October 2003

• Re: Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs Norman Walsh

Thursday, 23 October 2003

• Re: [xml-dev] Regd XML algorithms !! Jonathan Robie

Wednesday, 22 October 2003

• [simonstl@simonstl.com: Re: [xml-dev] UTF-8+names] John Cowan
• Re: [xml-dev] UTF-8+names Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: [xml-dev] NEL in XML 1.1 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [xml-dev] NEL in XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• [elharo@metalab.unc.edu: Re: [xml-dev] UTF-8+names] John Cowan
• Re: [xml-dev] UTF-8+names Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: [xml-dev] Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Alternate wording in terms of applications and infoset (was Re: Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs) Rick Jelliffe

Tuesday, 21 October 2003

• Re: Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs Chris Lilley
• Request for Erratum to XML 1.0 and 1.1 Specs Rick Jelliffe

Wednesday, 15 October 2003

• Re: Request for PR for XML 1.1 Paul Grosso

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• RE: Request for PR for XML 1.1 Francois Yergeau
• Re: Request for PR for XML 1.1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Monday, 13 October 2003

• Re: Request for PR for XML 1.1 Chris Lilley

Last message date: Thursday, 11 December 2003 15:17:02 UTC