xml-editor@w3.org from April to June 2001 by date

Tuesday, 26 June 2001

Re: deterministic content model? Rob Lugt

Monday, 18 June 2001

Re: Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 Martin Duerst

Friday, 15 June 2001

Re: XML erratum: UTF-8 Misha.Wolf@reuters.com

Thursday, 14 June 2001

Re: Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 Glenn Marcy
Re: Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 Paul Grosso
Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 Martin Duerst

Tuesday, 12 June 2001

Re: URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results james anderson
XML Conformance Tests Mary Brady

Monday, 11 June 2001

URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results james anderson
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results John Cowan
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results David Brownell
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results james anderson
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results David Brownell
XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results Rob Lugt

Thursday, 7 June 2001

Wednesday, 30 May 2001

Re: Erratum in section 1.1 of Canonical XML Dan Connolly

Thursday, 17 May 2001

Erratum: absent encoding declaration (was: Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator) Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 11 May 2001

RE: Erratum in section 1.1 of Canonical XML Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 26 April 2001

We Guarantee 5,000 Visitors to Your Site in 24 Hours! dVtqwEQXe@netscape.net

Wednesday, 18 April 2001

Erratum 7 in "XML 1.0 Second Edition Specification Errata" Dieter Köhler

Saturday, 7 April 2001

Re: Section 3.3.x questions/comments Richard Tobin

Thursday, 5 April 2001

Minor editorial error in section 6 of XML 2nd edition Elliotte Rusty Harold

Tuesday, 3 April 2001

standalone="no" David Carlisle

Last message date: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 06:14:06 UTC