xml-editor@w3.org from April to June 2001 by author

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Erratum: absent encoding declaration (was: Re: CSS validator stricter than XML validator) (Thursday, 17 May)

Dan Connolly

Re: Erratum in section 1.1 of Canonical XML (Wednesday, 30 May)

David Brownell

Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Monday, 11 June)
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Monday, 11 June)

David Carlisle

standalone="no" (Tuesday, 3 April)

Dieter Köhler

Erratum 7 in "XML 1.0 Second Edition Specification Errata" (Wednesday, 18 April)

dVtqwEQXe@netscape.net

We Guarantee 5,000 Visitors to Your Site in 24 Hours! (Thursday, 26 April)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

Minor editorial error in section 6 of XML 2nd edition (Thursday, 5 April)

Glenn Marcy

Re: Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 (Thursday, 14 June)

james anderson

Re: URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Tuesday, 12 June)
URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Monday, 11 June)
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Monday, 11 June)

John Cowan

Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Monday, 11 June)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

RE: Erratum in section 1.1 of Canonical XML (Friday, 11 May)

Martin Duerst

Re: Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 (Monday, 18 June)
Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: XML erratum: UTF-8 (Thursday, 7 June)

Mary Brady

XML Conformance Tests (Tuesday, 12 June)

Misha Wolf

Re: XML erratum: UTF-8 (Thursday, 7 June)
XML erratum: UTF-8 (Thursday, 7 June)
XML erratum: 10646 (Thursday, 7 June)

Misha.Wolf@reuters.com

Re: XML erratum: UTF-8 (Friday, 15 June)

Paul Grosso

Re: Regarding XML Proposed Erratum 71 (Thursday, 14 June)

Richard Tobin

Re: Section 3.3.x questions/comments (Saturday, 7 April)

Rob Lugt

Re: deterministic content model? (Tuesday, 26 June)
XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results (Monday, 11 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 06:14:06 UTC