Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results from David Brownell on 2001-06-11 (xml-editor@w3.org from April to June 2001)

From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:58:37 -0700
To: james.anderson@setf.de, xml-editor@w3.org
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Message-id: <0d5701c0f2a8$85f30e20$cc07aace@brownell.org>

> During conformance tests I observed that numerous test cases include
> system identifiers which are not valid URI references. 

Which test cases were those?

>    Yet the documents
> are categorized as valid. The recommendation sets constraints on syntax
> and interpretation of those references which _are_ URI references, but
> this reader could find no stipulation, that those system literals which
> _are not_ valid URI references are thereby in error. Is this intended?

Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 14:59:51 UTC