www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org from February 2004 by author

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• RE: XML Schema WG Comments on Last Call Draft (Thursday, 26 February)

Elliotte Harold

• XPointer selects an xi:fallback element in another document (Sunday, 1 February)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• RE: A possible security issue with accept attributes (Friday, 27 February)
• A possible security issue with accept attributes (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Ambiguity in treatment of accept attributes (Thursday, 26 February)
• XOM 1.0d23 implements the latest draft (Monday, 2 February)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: A possible security issue with accept attributes (Friday, 27 February)
• RE: Ambiguity in treatment of accept attributes (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Section 4.3 reference to character model (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: XPointer selects an xi:fallback element in another document (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: accept-charset vs. encoding (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: accept and accept-charset attributes (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Streaming basically impossible in the face of XPointers (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Is inclusion stable? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: XML Schema WG Comments on Last Call Draft (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: Interpretation of fragment IDs when parse="xml" (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: missing href, parse="text", xpointer="something" (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: Assymettry bewteen xi:include and xi:fallback (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: white space in parse attribute (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: New Namespace (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: Inclusion loops rely only on href, not on xpointer (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: Comments for WD-xinclude-20031110 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: XPointer example error (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: URI vs IRI in XInclude spec (Tuesday, 10 February)

Last message date: Friday, 27 February 2004 07:42:29 UTC