- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:33:09 -0800
- To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
Fixed in two places, section 3.1 and 4. Colloquial use of URI in the introduction, and terms such as "relative URI" and "base URI" are left unchanged. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xml-xinclude- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Tobin > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:04 AM > To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > Subject: URI vs IRI in XInclude spec > > > In section 3.1, the href attribute is described as a URI reference. It > should > be IRI reference, as in section 4.1. > > Other uses of "URI" should really be checked too. > > -- Richard >
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 11:33:54 UTC