- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:56:20 -0800
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
The removal of the accept-charset attribute makes this issue obsolete. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xml-xinclude- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Elliotte Rusty Harold > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:04 PM > To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > Subject: accept-charset vs. encoding > > > Now that we have accept-charset do we still need the encoding > attribute? Or do we need acceptCharset given that we have encoding? > > I'm know they aren't quite the same thing, but are you ever going to > want to set the encoding attribute to anything other than the charset > you use in acceptCharset? You might specify several charsets in > accept-charset, but if you do that what will the encoding attribute > mean anyway? You probably won't have it? Could we get by with one > attribute here instead of two? > -- > > Elliotte Rusty Harold > elharo@metalab.unc.edu > Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) > http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml > > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaula it > A >
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 18:56:21 UTC