- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:09:31 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0019.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0019.html>
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/>
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard, Dale Moberg, Umit Yalcinalp,
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Charlton Baretto,
Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Oct 13 telcon [.1].
[.1] --------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
DONE [.6] 2005-09-26: Arthur to figure out how to treat built-in schema
types. (LC315), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: DaveO to draft a response and send to the WG.
(LC335), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
close this issue (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to look for simplification options for
comment 12 of 344. (LC344#12), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Jonathan to point this out when it gets
Implemented (LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
interfaceless bindings (LC333), due 2005-10,06
? 2005-10-06: Marsh to investigate LC301 re .NET scenarios,
due 2005-10-13.
? 2005-10-06: Charlton to augment Hugo's proposal with
parameters for all serializations, and syntax
for suppressing parameters, due 2005-10-13.
DONE [.3] 2005-10-13: Marsh to add RDF links to home page,
due 2005-10-20.
? 2005-10-13: Paul and Glen to review SPARQL draft,
due 2005-10-20.
? 2005-10-13: Tony to review I18N draft, due 2005-10-20.
DONE [.4] 2005-10-13: Sanjiva to write up his style-based generic
mapping in to media type (LC304), due 2005-10-20.
DONE [.5] 2005-10-13: Hugo to write up URI's describing architected
serialization format extensibility point
(LC304), due 2005-10-20.
Current Editorial Action Items
? 2005-07-21: Arthur to add stable identifiers for each
assertion, due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-26: editors to fix the first paragraph of section 4
... does not make sense at all right now.
(LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Editors to add a sentence saying {address} is
optional because it could be defined by other
means, such as an WS-A endpoint reference or maybe
the scenario does not require an address.
(LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Editors fix "Case Elements NOT cited" in 6.8.1.2
header to be "Case of elements NOT cited" (LC345),
due 2005-10-06.
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions>
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/actions_owner.html <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/actions_owner.html>
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/>
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0022.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0022.html>
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html>
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0027.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0027.html>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF Nov 9 (joint) 10-11 Tokyo
- Registration [.1] (now closed - any stragglers?)
- Logistics [.2] (hotel registration closes Oct 9th.)
- Wed event [.3]
b. RDF Mapping publication status [.4]
c. SPARQL review
d. I18N review
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0018.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0018.html>
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html>
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0002.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0002.html>
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0046/wsdl-rdf.html__charset_ISO-8859-2 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0046/wsdl-rdf.html__charset_ISO-8859-2>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5. Editorial issues (as many as we can get through before xx:30)
- Issue LC354: typo in http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#rfc2119 <http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#rfc2119>
keywords [.6]
- Issue LC355: Error in Part 2, BindingFault no decision [.7]
- Issue LC356: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding)
from the i18n core wg (2) [.8]
- Issue LC358: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding)
from the i18n core wg (4) [.9]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC348 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC348>
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC349 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC349>
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC350 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC350>
[.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC351 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC351>
[.5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC352 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC352>
[.6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC354 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC354>
[.7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC355 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC355>
[.8] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC356 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC356>
[.9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC358 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC358>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Issue LC301: {soap action} granularity [.1]
- Response [.2] to Jonathan's mail to the WS-A WG [.3].
- Tom disagrees [.4]
- Waiting for .NET report from Jonathan.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301>
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0064.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0064.html>
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html>
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0066.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0066.html>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue LC304: Definition of a IANA media type token [.1]
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
- Analysis re LC337 from Hugo [.3]
- Latest proposal from Hugo [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304>
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html>
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0008.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0008.html>
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue LC345: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded
serialization [.1]
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
- Waiting for proposal from Charlton.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345>
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Splitting out the HTTP Binding
- At the FTF there was a groundswell of support for splitting the HTTP
binding out and running it through a third Last Call. I said we'd
consider it at a telcon.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model
properties? [.1]
- ACTION: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
interfaceless bindings.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC344: LC ISSUE: Editorial points [.1]
- Proposal (#5):
- remove "it is an error"
- copy the stuff from section 6: if things compose you might
get yourself in trouble
- styles are optional extensions
- ACTION: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
close this issue.
- ACTION: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and
see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are
no-ops.
DONE: Recommend dropping these sentences. [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344>
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0009.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0009.html>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC353: What is a valid WSDL component model? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC357: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1
Binding) from the i18n core wg (3) [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC357 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC357>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC359: binding fault property placement inconsistencies [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC359 <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC359>
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 15:09:46 UTC