- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:11:17 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@opensource.lk>, "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Doesn't this introduce a dependency on the Media Type Description _Note_? That seems like a procedural problem... ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Sanjiva Weerawarana Sent: Tue 10/18/2005 6:39 PM To: Hugo Haas Cc: WS-Description WG Subject: Re: describing a service that returns an image/jpg (for example) On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 18:06 +0200, Hugo Haas wrote: > That's a nice trick which I think works, and works well for binary > content. However, in LC337, the DAWG talks about HTML, plain text, > RDF. Won't they be forced to declare say their RDF as Base64-encoded? I know that sucks, but that's the reality of SOAP (and XML really): You can't embed HTML without base64 encoding it. Nor can you embed an XML document in SOAP without encoding it. If application/rdf+xml is used to carry an entire XML *document*, then there's no option but to encode it to carry it in SOAP. Text is slightly special and can obviously be done with just escaping instead of encoding but IMO its not worth special casing. Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 15:12:13 UTC