- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:16:00 -0700
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Potential regrets for the telcon, I seem to be one the first people to
kick off this year's flu season.
Formally, if I'm not present, the W3C has BEA's proxy on any straw polls
or votes. We are particularly interested in keeping the soap and http
binding within one document.
Cheers,
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:10 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda: 20 October 2005 WS Description telcon
>
>
> 0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
>
> See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and
other
> information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
>
> If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
> before the start of the telcon.
>
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0019.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0019.html>
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/>
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda
>
> 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
> Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard, Dale Moberg, Umit Yalcinalp,
> Jean-Jacques Moreau, Charlton Baretto,
> Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2. Approval of minutes:
> - Oct 13 telcon [.1].
>
> [.1]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3. Review of Action items [.1].
>
> ? 2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group
> report for requirements for schema evolution
> following closure of LC124
> DONE [.6] 2005-09-26: Arthur to figure out how to treat built-in
schema
> types. (LC315), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: DaveO to draft a response and send to the WG.
> (LC335), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able
to
> close this issue (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: Arthur to look for simplification options for
> comment 12 of 344. (LC344#12), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: Jonathan to point this out when it gets
> Implemented (LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting
with
> interfaceless bindings (LC333), due 2005-10,06
> ? 2005-10-06: Marsh to investigate LC301 re .NET scenarios,
> due 2005-10-13.
> ? 2005-10-06: Charlton to augment Hugo's proposal with
> parameters for all serializations, and syntax
> for suppressing parameters, due 2005-10-13.
> DONE [.3] 2005-10-13: Marsh to add RDF links to home page,
> due 2005-10-20.
> ? 2005-10-13: Paul and Glen to review SPARQL draft,
> due 2005-10-20.
> ? 2005-10-13: Tony to review I18N draft, due 2005-10-20.
> DONE [.4] 2005-10-13: Sanjiva to write up his style-based generic
> mapping in to media type (LC304), due
2005-10-20.
> DONE [.5] 2005-10-13: Hugo to write up URI's describing architected
> serialization format extensibility point
> (LC304), due 2005-10-20.
>
> Current Editorial Action Items
> ? 2005-07-21: Arthur to add stable identifiers for each
> assertion, due 2005-09-26.
> ? 2005-09-26: editors to fix the first paragraph of section 4
> ... does not make sense at all right now.
> (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: Editors to add a sentence saying {address} is
> optional because it could be defined by other
> means, such as an WS-A endpoint reference or
maybe
> the scenario does not require an address.
> (LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
> ? 2005-09-26: Editors fix "Case Elements NOT cited" in 6.8.1.2
> header to be "Case of elements NOT cited"
(LC345),
> due 2005-10-06.
>
> Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions>
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/actions_owner.html
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/actions_owner.html>
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/>
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0022.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0022.html>
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html>
> [.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0027.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0027.html>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4. Administrivia
> a. Upcoming FTF Nov 9 (joint) 10-11 Tokyo
> - Registration [.1] (now closed - any stragglers?)
> - Logistics [.2] (hotel registration closes Oct 9th.)
> - Wed event [.3]
> b. RDF Mapping publication status [.4]
> c. SPARQL review
> d. I18N review
>
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0018.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0018.html>
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html>
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0002.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0002.html>
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-
> 0046/wsdl-rdf.html__charset_ISO-8859-2
>
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0046/wsdl-
> rdf.html__charset_ISO-8859-2>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 5. Editorial issues (as many as we can get through before xx:30)
> - Issue LC354: typo in http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#rfc2119
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#rfc2119>
> keywords [.6]
> - Issue LC355: Error in Part 2, BindingFault no decision [.7]
> - Issue LC356: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1
Binding)
> from the i18n core wg (2) [.8]
> - Issue LC358: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1
Binding)
> from the i18n core wg (4) [.9]
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC348
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC348>
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC349
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC349>
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC350
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC350>
> [.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC351
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC351>
> [.5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC352
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC352>
> [.6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC354
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC354>
> [.7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC355
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC355>
> [.8] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC356
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC356>
> [.9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC358
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC358>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 6. Issue LC301: {soap action} granularity [.1]
> - Response [.2] to Jonathan's mail to the WS-A WG [.3].
> - Tom disagrees [.4]
> - Waiting for .NET report from Jonathan.
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301>
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0064.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0064.html>
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html>
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0066.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0066.html>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 7. Issue LC304: Definition of a IANA media type token [.1]
> - Proposal from Hugo [.2]
> - Analysis re LC337 from Hugo [.3]
> - Latest proposal from Hugo [.4]
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304>
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html>
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0008.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0008.html>
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 8. Issue LC345: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded
> serialization [.1]
> - Proposal from Hugo [.2]
> - Waiting for proposal from Charlton.
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345>
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 9. Splitting out the HTTP Binding
> - At the FTF there was a groundswell of support for splitting the
HTTP
> binding out and running it through a third Last Call. I said we'd
> consider it at a telcon.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 10. Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model
> properties? [.1]
> - ACTION: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
> interfaceless bindings.
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 11. Issue LC344: LC ISSUE: Editorial points [.1]
> - Proposal (#5):
> - remove "it is an error"
> - copy the stuff from section 6: if things compose you might
> get yourself in trouble
> - styles are optional extensions
> - ACTION: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
> close this issue.
> - ACTION: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and
> see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are
> no-ops.
> DONE: Recommend dropping these sentences. [.2]
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344>
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0009.html
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0009.html>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 12. Issue LC353: What is a valid WSDL component model? [.1]
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 13. Issue LC357: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1
> Binding) from the i18n core wg (3) [.1]
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC357
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC357>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 14. Issue LC359: binding fault property placement inconsistencies [.1]
>
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC359
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC359>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 06:17:08 UTC