- From: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:03:46 -0800
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Jonathan, Since it's unlikely that I'll be able to attend the FTF on Thursday, as I detailed in my registration, would it be possible to move the discussion of LC333 to Friday? E.g. by moving the items currently scheduled for Friday morning 10am-12.30pm to Thursday afternoon and replacing them with LC333. Thanks, Roberto Jonathan Marsh wrote: > Logistics [1] and dial-in details [2] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html > [2] TBD > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wed 9 November - Joint meeting with WS-Addressing WG > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 09:00 introductions and logistics > > 09:15 Expected end game schedules (both groups) > > 09:30 WS-Addressing W5DL binding overview (presented by WS-A WG) > > 10:00 Additional async capabilities and issues > > 10:45 Morning Break > > 11:00 Async (cont.) > > 12:00 TAG-related Web services issues > > 13:00 Adjourn for Lunch > > 14:00 leave for Kamakura event > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Thu 10 November WS Description WG meeting > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 09:00 Opening formalities > a. Introductions & logistics > b. Assign scribes: > TBD > c. Action Item [3] Review: > TBD > d. Rechartering (straight extension?) > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions > > 09:45 Issue LC304: Definition of a IANA media type token [.1] > - Proposal from Hugo [.2] > - Analysis re LC337 from Hugo [.3] > - Latest proposal from Hugo [.4] > - even later [.5] > - Sanjiva's media type style proposal [.6] > - Hugo's third proposal [.7] > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304 > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html > [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0008.html > [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html > [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0046.html > [.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0022.html > [.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0063.html > > 10:45 Break > > 11:00 Issue LC345: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded > serialization [.1] > - Proposal from Hugo [.2] > - Proposal from Charlton [.3]. > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345 > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html > [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0045.html > > 12:30 Lunch > > 13:30 Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model > properties? [.1] > - Roberto's proposal [.2] > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333 > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0051.html > > 15:00 Break > > 15:30 Issue LC333 (cont.) > > 17:00 Adjourn > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Fri 11 November > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 09:00 Splitting out the HTTP Binding > > 10:00 Issue LC344: LC ISSUE: Editorial points [.1] > - Proposal (#5): > - remove "it is an error" > - copy the stuff from section 6: if things compose you might > get yourself in trouble > - styles are optional extensions > - ACTION: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to > close this issue. > DONE: Proposal at [.3], but with new consideration at [.4] > - ACTION: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and > see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are > no-ops. > DONE: Recommend dropping these sentences. [.2] > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344 > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0009.html > [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0040.html > [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0041.html > > 10:45 Break > > 11:00 Issue LC353: What is a valid WSDL component model? [.1] > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353 > > 11:45 Issue LC357: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 > Binding) from the i18n core wg (3) [.1] > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC357 > > 12:30 Lunch > > 13:30 Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria / Test Suite issues > > 15:00 Break > > 15:30 Unfinished business > > 16:00 Adjourn
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 23:03:52 UTC