- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:21:34 -0400
- To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
At 12:31 PM 7/8/2004 -0700, Prasad Yendluri wrote: >. . . My preference would be towards a mechanism that captures [the >operation name] in the message itself . . . . I agree that this would be conceptually cleaner layering, having the message body include all and only the information that is semantically relevant to the application (since the operation name is clearly semantically relevant if it is used to dispatch). However, my perception is that this isn't the direction the industry winds are blowing. -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 16:21:37 UTC