- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:42:13 -0400
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
I would note that there is an other solution:
-add the following entries in the table C.2 Fragment Identifiers of Part
1:
Construct: in
x: {name} property of interface
y: {name} property of operation
Construct: out
x: {name} property of interface
y: {name} property of operation
-point your action attribute to the constructs in, out, and fault
provided in table C.2. (you might want to have in-fault, and out-fault
in table C.2 instead of fault).
- do the binding to SOAP as your proposed.
In other words, I'm proposing not to reinvent a URI mapping, but improve
and reuse the existing one.
Philippe
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 15:42:58 UTC