- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 13:34:16 -0700
- To: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
David Booth wrote: > At 12:31 PM 7/8/2004 -0700, Prasad Yendluri wrote: > >> . . . My preference would be towards a mechanism that captures [the >> operation name] in the message itself . . . . > > I agree that this would be conceptually cleaner layering, having the > message body include all and only the information that is semantically > relevant to the application (since the operation name is clearly > semantically relevant if it is used to dispatch). However, my > perception is that this isn't the direction the industry winds are > blowing. I know. It might still be worth a try :) Regards, Prasad
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 16:37:18 UTC