Agenda for 11 July 2002 WS Description WG

Dial in information (members only):
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0017.html

See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. 

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
      Mike McHugh (fallback Don Mullen, Jochen Ruetschlin,
Adi Sakala, Igor Sedukhin, Bill Stumbo)

2.  Representation change: Mario Jeckle replaced by Barbara Zengler.

3.  Approval of minutes from 27 June telcon [6].

4.  Review of Action items.
     2002-06-20: Sanjiva. Champion for 6c. Issue: SOAPAction1 #1
     2002-06-20: Jean-J. Analyze whether WSD should gneralize a
                 mechanism to provide protocol headers. This was 
                 discussed as part of 6d. Issue: SOAPAction2 #2
                 actor URI in WSDL? #17
     2002-06-20: JeffS Champion for 6h. Issue: Default for transport 
                 of <soap:binding> #18
     2002-06-20: Issue Editor. Jean-J identifies dup issue: 6q. Issue: 
                 SOAP 1.1 backward compatibility support? #32 (Needs
                 Clarification.)
     2002-06-27: JS will add the draft requirements to the document.
     2002-06-27: JS will add media types as a MUST requirement.
DONE 2002-06-27: SW will distribute a draft of final draft by the close
of
                 the day on Thursday.
     2002-06-27: Issues list editors to look at the issues in Agenda
item 9
                 and make sure that they are not duplicate and add them
to
                 issue list.
     2002-06-27: JM will think about what should be done with the
suggestion
                 for a note or appendix on 1.2 -> 1.2 transition.

5.  Spec published at [7], [8].  Plan to publish again in late Sept?

6.  Requirements document [9].  Two draft requirements remain to
resolve.

7.  SOAP 1.2 Last Call [15, 16, 17] call for review [18].  Need
volunteer to consolidate our official comments for approval by July
18th.

8. Editorial Issues
   Plan [10] to delegate responsibility to editors for all issues marked
as "Editorial" in the issues list [11].

   Issues to be reclassified:
    #51 Asymmetry between soap:body and soap:header [26]

   Issues to be resolved by editors:
    #7 xsd:binary in example
    #8 Grammar for Attribute Extensibility
    #9 Example 1 type
    #10 Example 3 element order bug
    #11 <import> grammar
    #12 <part> name attribute
    #13 Parameter Order missing from schema
    #16 Binding operations in portType
    #19 soap:headerfault optional?
    #20 <soap:header> 'part' or 'parts' attribute?
    #22 Specification not XML Infoset based
    #33 Distinction between RPC style and document style
    #38 Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where.
    #43 Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"?
    #44 "name" attribute of "soap:fault" is not defined in schema
    #45 "use" attribute of "fault" should be optional
    #46 "transport" attribute of "soap:binding" should be optional
    #47 "soap:operation" should be optional
    #48 "use" attribute of "soap:body" should be optional
    #49 Inconsistency in "soap:header" specification
    #50 Array Declaration Issues
    #59 MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related
    #60 Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts

9.  New Issues
    - Issue: elementFormDefault="qualified" in MIME Schema [12]
    - Open Content Model non-deterministic [22]
    - Operations and HTTP verbs [23]
    - WSDL and Asynchronous Messaging? [24]
    - WSDL bindings for FTP? [25]

10. Reopen issue-intra-port-relationship [21]?

11. Issue: Overloading operations.
    Split issue into two [13].
    Awaiting Jonathan's proposal for remaining part.

12. SOAP 1.2 support TF [20].
    Review proposal for encoding and use attributes [19].

13. Issue 4: Namespaces
    Gudge's proposal [27], musings at [28]

14. Issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>
    Sanjiva's proposal to remove this attribute [29].

15. Issue issue-multiple-services.
    Sanjiva's proposal at [30].
 
16. Issue 5: EncodingStyle.
    Arthur recommends closing as a dupe of Issue #30. [31]

17. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model 
    Gudge's explains at [32]

18. Issue 30: soap:body encodingStyle
    Arthur's proposal [31]

19. Issue service-type:  [33] OK to wait on Abstract Component work to
provide a more concrete proposal?

20. Issue remove-solicit-response-operations: Removing solicit-response
and notifications.  [34] OK to schedule for FTF?

21. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
    Jeffrey recommends no change [35].

- Jonathan

--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0243.html
[7] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-wsdl12-20020709/
[8] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-wsdl12-bindings-20020709/
[9]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/requirements/ws-desc-re
qs.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0244.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0250.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0247.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/ 
[16] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/ 
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/ 
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0001.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0016.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0006.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0261.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0054.html
[23]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2002Jul/0000
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0018.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0006.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0048.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0168.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0191.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0175.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0165.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0002.html
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0109.html
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 15:41:59 UTC