- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:49:43 +0200
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Non-editorial issues (IMO):
* 33 Distinction between RPC style and document style [given current
thread]
* 50 Array Declaration Issues [there is a larger issue concercing arrays]
Jean-Jacques.
Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> 8. Editorial Issues
> Issues to be resolved by editors:
> #7 xsd:binary in example
> #8 Grammar for Attribute Extensibility
> #9 Example 1 type
> #10 Example 3 element order bug
> #11 <import> grammar
> #12 <part> name attribute
> #13 Parameter Order missing from schema
> #16 Binding operations in portType
> #19 soap:headerfault optional?
> #20 <soap:header> 'part' or 'parts' attribute?
> #22 Specification not XML Infoset based
> #33 Distinction between RPC style and document style
> #38 Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where.
> #43 Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"?
> #44 "name" attribute of "soap:fault" is not defined in schema
> #45 "use" attribute of "fault" should be optional
> #46 "transport" attribute of "soap:binding" should be optional
> #47 "soap:operation" should be optional
> #48 "use" attribute of "soap:body" should be optional
> #49 Inconsistency in "soap:header" specification
> #50 Array Declaration Issues
> #59 MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related
> #60 Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts
>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 08:50:25 UTC