- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 12:45:25 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
In today's telcon, we agreed on a plan to give the editors discretion to resolve issues that are purely editorial without individual WG discussion (specifically, telcon time). The WG is given two weeks (till July 11) to review the issues list and identify issues mis-classified as Editorial. Through reverse engineering, I am defining "Editorial" as any issue that doesn't require WG discussion and decision to resolve. It may be that you feel that the prose describing a particular feature would benefit from WG discussion, in which case you should propose a reclassification. For example, the input/output terminology issue we discussed and resolved this morning would not be classified as Editorial according to this definition. wwww Please also feel free to suggest alternate resolutions or other clarifications to an issue during your review, but please distinguish between helpful advice and a request to reclassify the issue. The consolidated issues list is at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html.
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 15:45:57 UTC