Missing SCXML Test Coverage
SCXML Test Plan Coverage
LXSC SCXML Implementation Report
Bad SCXML test ID for assertion 415.
Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
- Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
- Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
- Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
SCXML Test 343 needs invalidLocation
SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
SCXML Test 553 assumes unset variables are invalid
Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
- Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
SCXML Algorithm minor markup tweaks
More issues with the IRP tests
IDL for SCXML interpreters
Updated IRP for uSCXML
test534 - quote the search string please
Interpretation Algorithm calls some() on an OrderedSet
CfP: FINANCEcom - deadline 10/9 - Enterprise Applications, Markets, and Services in the Finance Industry, Sydney, Australia
IRP for uSCXML
- Re: IRP for uSCXML
- Re: IRP for uSCXML
IRP: Dead links on IRP page
SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
- Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
SCXML Test 354 uses transform-dependent values directly
SCXML Test 350 uses datamodel-specific expression
Remove <log> from SCXML test 331?
Test 330 is missing SCXML namespace
Synchronizing Data Models
Change to SCXML Test 298
CfP: Academic MindTrek Conference 2014 (30th June'14): MEDIA - Social Media/Digital Games/Ambient Media/Media Business/Information Systems in Media Industries/ICT&E-Gonvernment
[Icmi2014:20] 2nd Call for papers for Workshops at ICMI 2014
SCXML is returning to Last Call
new draft of SCXML published
When are cond-expressions evaluated?
Consequences of the final state?
Transitions between parallel tags.
Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Recommendation for new behavior for <subdialog>
[Icmi2014:19] ICMI 2014: The 2nd Call for Demonstrations and Exhibits
[Icmi2014:18] ICMI 2014: CALL FOR WORKSHOP PAPERS
[Icmi2014:17] ICMI 2014: CALL FOR PAPERS -- the new submission deadline
How many transition tags are allowed under <initial>?
Broken SCXML test links
SCXML Tests assume Invalid Data Model Locations
- Re: SCXML Tests assume Invalid Data Model Locations
- Re: SCXML Tests assume Invalid Data Model Locations
Need to pre-declare SCXML data?
Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
- Re: Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
- Re: Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?