- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:21:06 -0400
- To: www-voice@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53B1E2D2.6000403@gmail.com>
Test354 is written against the scxml event i/o processor, so it is mandatory. We can modify it to add conf:content or, as I suggested before, we can modify the test not to quote 123 in eventDataVal, so you would get both values unquoted. Does that work? - Jim On 6/30/2014 6:15 PM, Gavin Kistner wrote: > On Jun 30, 2014, at 03:43 PM, David Junger <tffy@free.fr> wrote: > >> Le 30 jun 2014 à 17:47, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com >> <mailto:1jhbarnett@gmail.com> > a écrit : >> >> > I'm not sure I follow. B.2.8.1 is part of the section on the >> ECMA Script data model. Nothing their applies to Gavin's datamodel. >> >> Oh, right. Sorry. So, that means Gavin shouldn't try to pass test >> 354. There, problem solved. > :D > If test 354 were marked as non-mandatory, I'd be happy to just skip it. > > Alternatively, I feel that this could be solved by not having > <content>123</content> > in the .txml, but instead something like: > <conf:content>123</content>. > > Along with the existing conf:eventdataVal="123" then I could simply > quote both values in my XSLT equivalent, and both ECMAScript and Lua > data models would be happy. -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 22:21:46 UTC