- From: Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:29:04 +0200
- To: Voice List <www-voice@w3.org>
On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com> wrote: > I think that in test 298 perhaps this code: > <donedata> > <param conf:name="3" conf:location="2"/> > </donedata> > > should be changed to this: > <donedata> > <param conf:name="3" conf:invalidLocation=""/> > </donedata> > > Per previous discussions, just because a location was not predeclared does not make it invalid in all data models. (Right?) > > Perhaps there should further be an invalidName, perhaps tested independently. (Perhaps there already is and I’ve not yet reached that test :) Actually, I wish to change this suggestion. invalidLocation is for *writing* to an invalid location during <assign>. In this case (and in test 343) we want to READ from an invalid location for param. As such I would recommend instead conf:invalidParamLocation for both tests. (In my very permissive data model, I am able to create an invalid location for <assign> by using a system variable, e.g. starting with underscore. This is valid for reading, however, and so I need another, different technique to simulate this.)
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 10:29:54 UTC