www-validator@w3.org from January 2010 by thread

Why is it not allowed to close the meta-tag? Karina Bürger (Thursday, 28 January)

Re: Why is it not allowed to close the meta-tag? David Dorward (Thursday, 28 January)

Malformed JSON output format Yaroslav Samchuk (Wednesday, 27 January)

Re: Malformed JSON output format Ville Skyttä (Thursday, 28 January)

W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Gordon (Tuesday, 26 January)

Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Michael A. Peters (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Michael A. Peters (Thursday, 28 January)
  - Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Gordon (Thursday, 28 January)
    - Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype David Dorward (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Dean Edridge (Thursday, 28 January)

Validation Issues Dacia Brown (Friday, 22 January)

Re: Validation Issues David Dorward (Tuesday, 26 January)

checklink: Version of online linkchecker in Aug-Oct 2008 Wu, Zhiqiang \(Jimmy\) (Tuesday, 26 January)

Missing closing li tag, "document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional!" Axel Christiansen (Tuesday, 26 January)

Re: Missing closing li tag, "document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional!" David Dorward (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Missing closing li tag, "document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional!" Dag-Erling Smørgrav (Tuesday, 26 January)

Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Dave Baldwin (Sunday, 24 January)

Re: Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Stefan Nolte (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Ville Skyttä (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Dave Baldwin (Sunday, 31 January)

Re: pbm on installing w3c validator on debian/ubuntu Marc (Friday, 22 January)

HTML5 + meta http-equiv Jannis Gundermann | Supply (Friday, 22 January)

Re: HTML5 + meta http-equiv Ville Skyttä (Friday, 22 January)

Validator accuses <svg:g enable-background="new"> as error Ramsey Gurley (Monday, 18 January)

Missing html end tag not seen by the validator Julien ÉLIE (Monday, 18 January)

Re: Missing html end tag not seen by the validator Julien ÉLIE (Tuesday, 19 January)

problems Чухломин Михаил Сергеевич (Sunday, 17 January)

Validation code on the site. Служба Поддержки Secret-Idea.com (Sunday, 17 January)

Re: Validation code on the site. David Dorward (Monday, 18 January)

Next Generation Validatior,Multilingual Ronny Vårdal (Sunday, 17 January)

Validity of Wordpress-Blog Guido Fugo (Thursday, 14 January)

Re: Validity of Wordpress-Blog Dag-Erling Smørgrav (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Validity of Wordpress-Blog Cindy Sue Causey (Saturday, 30 January)

Problems with w3schools.org Philipp Maske [Location Bretagne] (Thursday, 14 January)

Re: Problems with w3schools.org David Dorward (Thursday, 14 January)

Why validate Sergio Lopes (Tuesday, 12 January)

Re: Why validate Jens Meiert (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: Why validate Tilman Bender (Wednesday, 13 January)
  - Re: Why validate Sergio Lopes (Wednesday, 13 January)
    - Re: Why validate Debbie Mitchell (Wednesday, 13 January)

document type does not allow element "address" here Christian Paul (Tuesday, 12 January)

Re: document type does not allow element "address" here Jukka K. Korpela (Tuesday, 12 January)

big bug in your validator. Michael Stucki (Monday, 11 January)

Re: big bug in your validator. David Dorward (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: big bug in your validator. Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 12 January)

checklink fails today, gives message 'Error: 302 Found' Jim Masters (Monday, 11 January)

Re: checklink fails today, gives message 'Error: 302 Found' Ville Skyttä (Wednesday, 13 January)

[VE][108] Add Subject Here Jiří Havlíček (Friday, 8 January)

Re: [VE][108] Add Subject Here Jukka K. Korpela (Friday, 8 January)
Re: [VE][108] Add Subject Here Thalassoline - Cedric (Tuesday, 12 January)

checklink: LWP in user agent string means some servers return 406 Not Acceptable Phil Archer (Thursday, 7 January)

[VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here David Peabody (Tuesday, 5 January)

Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Dag-Erling Smørgrav (Wednesday, 6 January)
- Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Jukka K. Korpela (Wednesday, 6 January)
  - Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Lou King (Wednesday, 6 January)
    - Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Jukka K. Korpela (Wednesday, 6 January)
      - RE: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here David Peabody (Wednesday, 6 January)
        
        Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Jukka K. Korpela (Thursday, 7 January)
  - Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Dag-Erling Smørgrav (Thursday, 7 January)

Service Request Help Daniel Hendrycks (Sunday, 3 January)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2010 23:08:06 UTC