www-validator@w3.org from January 2010 by date

Sunday, 31 January 2010

Re: Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Dave Baldwin

Saturday, 30 January 2010

Re: Validity of Wordpress-Blog Cindy Sue Causey

Thursday, 28 January 2010

Re: Why is it not allowed to close the meta-tag? David Dorward
Why is it not allowed to close the meta-tag? Karina Bürger
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Dean Edridge
Re: Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Ville Skyttä
Re: Malformed JSON output format Ville Skyttä
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype David Dorward
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Gordon
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Michael A. Peters

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

Re: Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Stefan Nolte
Malformed JSON output format Yaroslav Samchuk
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Michael A. Peters
Re: W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Henri Sivonen

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

W3C Validator trips on Google Frame meta line with HTML5 doctype Gordon
Re: Missing closing li tag, "document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional!" Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Re: Validation Issues David Dorward
Re: Missing closing li tag, "document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional!" David Dorward

Friday, 22 January 2010

Validation Issues Dacia Brown

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

checklink: Version of online linkchecker in Aug-Oct 2008 Wu, Zhiqiang \(Jimmy\)
Missing closing li tag, "document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional!" Axel Christiansen

Sunday, 24 January 2010

Attribute "XYZ" is not a valid attribute. Did you mean "xyz"? Dave Baldwin

Friday, 22 January 2010

Re: pbm on installing w3c validator on debian/ubuntu Marc
Re: HTML5 + meta http-equiv Ville Skyttä
HTML5 + meta http-equiv Jannis Gundermann | Supply

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Re: Missing html end tag not seen by the validator Julien ÉLIE

Monday, 18 January 2010

Validator accuses <svg:g enable-background="new"> as error Ramsey Gurley
Missing html end tag not seen by the validator Julien ÉLIE
Re: Validation code on the site. David Dorward

Sunday, 17 January 2010

problems Чухломин Михаил Сергеевич
Validation code on the site. Служба Поддержки Secret-Idea.com

Monday, 18 January 2010

Re: Validity of Wordpress-Blog Dag-Erling Smørgrav

Sunday, 17 January 2010

Next Generation Validatior,Multilingual Ronny Vårdal

Thursday, 14 January 2010

Validity of Wordpress-Blog Guido Fugo
Re: Problems with w3schools.org David Dorward

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

Re: Why validate Debbie Mitchell

Thursday, 14 January 2010

Problems with w3schools.org Philipp Maske [Location Bretagne]

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

Re: checklink fails today, gives message 'Error: 302 Found' Ville Skyttä
Re: Why validate Sergio Lopes
Re: Why validate Tilman Bender
Re: Why validate Jens Meiert

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

Why validate Sergio Lopes
Re: big bug in your validator. Shane McCarron
Re: document type does not allow element "address" here Jukka K. Korpela
document type does not allow element "address" here Christian Paul
Re: [VE][108] Add Subject Here Thalassoline - Cedric
Re: big bug in your validator. David Dorward

Monday, 11 January 2010

big bug in your validator. Michael Stucki
checklink fails today, gives message 'Error: 302 Found' Jim Masters

Friday, 8 January 2010

Re: [VE][108] Add Subject Here Jukka K. Korpela
[VE][108] Add Subject Here Jiří Havlíček

Thursday, 7 January 2010

checklink: LWP in user agent string means some servers return 406 Not Acceptable Phil Archer
Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Jukka K. Korpela
Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Dag-Erling Smørgrav

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

RE: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here David Peabody
Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Jukka K. Korpela
Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Lou King
Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Jukka K. Korpela
Re: [VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here Dag-Erling Smørgrav

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

[VE][64] document type does not allow element "TFOOT" here David Peabody

Sunday, 3 January 2010

Service Request Help Daniel Hendrycks

Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2010 23:08:06 UTC