Tuesday, 31 May 2005
Monday, 30 May 2005
Saturday, 28 May 2005
Friday, 27 May 2005
- Re: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 - RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 - RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 - RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 
Wednesday, 25 May 2005
- RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 - RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 - Tag meeting of 24 May 2005 was cancelled (was: Tag meeting of 24 March 2005 was cancelled)
 - RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 
Tuesday, 24 May 2005
- RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 - Tag meeting of 24 March 2005 was cancelled
 - TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
 
Monday, 23 May 2005
Tuesday, 17 May 2005
Friday, 13 May 2005
- Addendum to TAG Review of XRI 2.0
 - Re: XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
 - Re: XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
 
Thursday, 12 May 2005
- Re: [standardizedFieldValues-51] new issue on deploying new terms, media types, properties, elements, etc.
 - RE: XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
 - Re: XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
 - Re: XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
 - Re: Minutes of TAG 2005-May-03 telcon attached (putMediaType-38, abstractComponentRefs-37, binaryXML-30, httpRange-14)
 - Minutes of TAG 2005-May-03 telcon attached
 
Wednesday, 11 May 2005
- [standardizedFieldValues-51] new issue on deploying new terms, media types, properties, elements, etc.
 - Re: TAG telcon of 2005-05-10 (URNsAndRegistries-50, binaryXML-30)
 - XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
 
Tuesday, 10 May 2005
- [Dan Connolly] XRIs are not designed to be URIs [Fwd: Re:xri: registration with IETF/IANA?]
 - TAG telcon of 2005-05-10
 
Monday, 9 May 2005
Saturday, 7 May 2005
- Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - [httpRange-14] a thought experiment was: Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 
Friday, 6 May 2005
- Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - Re: XRI 2.0 Review by the W3C TAG - security concern?
 - Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 
Thursday, 5 May 2005
- Re: XRI 2.0 Review by the W3C TAG - security concern?
 - Another potential new TAG issue: Use of <, >, and & in XML based data formats
 - Re: Potential new TAG issue: Content Selection for Device Independence (DISelect) 1.0
 - Potential new TAG issue: Content Selection for Device Independence (DISelect) 1.0
 
Tuesday, 3 May 2005
- RE: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - Re: [putMediaType-38] reopening discussion
 - Re: [putMediaType-38] reopening discussion
 - making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
 - RE: [putMediaType-38] reopening discussion
 - Re: [putMediaType-38] reopening discussion
 - RE: Dave Orchard individual review of XBC for the TAG
 - RE: httpRange-14: some dimensions of space of positions
 - Re: [putMediaType-38] reopening discussion
 - Re: httpRange-14: some dimensions of space of positions
 - Re: httpRange-14: some dimensions of space of positions
 - Re: httpRange-14: some dimensions of space of positions
 - [putMediaType-38] reopening discussion