- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:13:49 +0200
- To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Cc: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com> wrote: > Bringing this back on track... > > (1) several of us have now stated that computed style for detached nodes > doesn't really make sense. Rune may disagree with this stance but I'm not > sure? I don't argue the usefulness of it, just that it can be spec'ed and implemented in a way consistent with computed style in display:none subtrees and resolved values. > (2) if this were a general rule then we'd have an answer for the initial > question (what to do with computed style of a cloned node) - as the clone > would not be in-document, it wouldn't have a computed style. Yes, a cloned node would be no different than a node created with say document.createElement() not in-document in this sense. -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 07:14:17 UTC