- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:08:27 +0200
- To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Cc: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com> wrote: > (1) several of us have now stated that computed style for detached nodes > doesn't really make sense. Rune may disagree with this stance but I'm not > sure? It's resolved, not computed, for what it's worth. Pretty sure it was specified this way because content relies on it being this way. Maybe that's no longer true? > (2) if this were a general rule then we'd have an answer for the initial > question (what to do with computed style of a cloned node) - as the clone > would not be in-document, it wouldn't have a computed style. Agreed, cloning should have no material effect one way or another here. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 06:08:51 UTC