- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:34:37 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/25/2015 06:11 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> We're not trying to be fancy here, just sync up our definitions of >>>> "basic whitespace". This isn't about all the various typographic >>>> types of whitespace used in text, just the types of whitespace that >>>> show up in documents to separate elements and such. That's just the >>>> ascii space (U+0020), ascii tab (U+0009), and the three ascii line >>>> feeds (U+000A, U+000C, and U+000D). >>> >>> NBSP is extremely common for showing up in documents to separate elements and such. Mostly where it's not desired, often because of the way it got typed into some editor. I think it should be included. It's not a request to be fancy. It's really very basic and common. >> >> Also, if some bozo used it as a faux indent, that shouldn't prevent meaningful use of :first-letter. > > If one goes beyond ASCII at all, I really don't see a good reason not > to include all Unicode whitespace characters. And with my author hat > on, I think selectors probably *should* consistently use "all Unicode > whitespace characters" as their definition of white space. I think we only really care here about what CSS considers white space and will collapse away. Which is not all Unicode Zw characters. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 19:35:06 UTC