- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:51:25 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:34 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 08/25/2015 06:11 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> If one goes beyond ASCII at all, I really don't see a good reason not >> to include all Unicode whitespace characters. And with my author hat >> on, I think selectors probably *should* consistently use "all Unicode >> whitespace characters" as their definition of white space. > > I think we only really care here about what CSS considers white space > and will collapse away. > > Which is not all Unicode Zw characters. "Everything that white-space:normal will collapse" seems like a reasonable rule too, but why should *that* not be "all Zw characters"? zw
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 19:51:49 UTC