W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [selectors4] :blank, ::first-letter, and what a whitespace character is

From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:11:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMgYQ4_ZQcP6K3dG9bxcL5K4w_XiGhfTO7PgiXTB30YMuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We're not trying to be fancy here, just sync up our definitions of
>>> "basic whitespace".  This isn't about all the various typographic
>>> types of whitespace used in text, just the types of whitespace that
>>> show up in documents to separate elements and such.  That's just the
>>> ascii space (U+0020), ascii tab (U+0009), and the three ascii line
>>> feeds (U+000A, U+000C, and U+000D).
>>
>> NBSP is extremely common for showing up in documents to separate elements and such. Mostly where it's not desired, often because of the way it got typed into some editor. I think it should be included. It's not a request to be fancy. It's really very basic and common.
>
> Also, if some bozo used it as a faux indent, that shouldn't prevent meaningful use of :first-letter.

If one goes beyond ASCII at all, I really don't see a good reason not
to include all Unicode whitespace characters. And with my author hat
on, I think selectors probably *should* consistently use "all Unicode
whitespace characters" as their definition of white space.

(I might make an exception for U+0085, which is almost certainly *not*
NEXT LINE but a mistranscode of ELLIPSIS.)

zw
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 16:12:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 August 2015 16:12:11 UTC