Re: [selectors-4] :blank pseudo-class

25.08.2015, 19:25, "Brad Kemper" <>:
>> šOn Aug 24, 2015, at 2:39 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <> wrote:
>> šThis is just "a better :empty". It was a silly mistake of ours that
>> š:empty didn't apply to elements with only whitespace
> Agreed. So can we just fix :empty to be more broad, without breaking layouts? Or do we need a separate pseudo class?

Indeed, if `:empty` in its current form is a mistake, then we could just redefine it to include whitespace instead of inventing something similar but slightly different and potentially confusingly named.

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 16:41:10 UTC