www-rdf-logic@w3.org from July 2001 by date

Friday, 27 July 2001

• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions pat hayes
• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? pat hayes

Thursday, 26 July 2001

• RE: Announcement: DAML Annotation Tool available for Download Hart, Lewis
• Re: Attention Users! (2 in a series) - DAML rdf:about Nikita Ogievetsky
• Re: Attention Users! (2 in a series) - DAML rdf:about Andrei S. Lopatenko
• Re: Attention Users! (2 in a series) - DAML rdf:about Andrei S. Lopatenko
• Fw: Attention Users! (2 in a series) Nikita Ogievetsky

Wednesday, 25 July 2001

• FOIS 2001 Bill Andersen
• Questions for Jena Users Brian McBride
• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? Andrei S. Lopatenko
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Ian Horrocks
• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? Enrico Franconi
• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? David Martin

Tuesday, 24 July 2001

• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? pat hayes
• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? Seth Russell
• Re: Why must the web be monotonic ? pat hayes
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions pat hayes
• Why must the web be monotonic ? Seth Russell
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Ian Horrocks
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions pat hayes

Thursday, 19 July 2001

• Trains Ain't Planes, it's plain to see (from Risks Digest21.51) tim finin
• RE: Resources with more than one type Dickinson, Ian J
• Re: Resources with more than one type Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Resources with more than one type David Martin
• Announcement: DAML Annotation Tool available for Download Siegfried Handschuh
• Re: Resources with more than one type Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Tim Berners-Lee
• [ANN] RDF Graph Modeling Language puninj@cs.rpi.edu

Wednesday, 18 July 2001

• updated axiomatic semantics available Deborah McGuinness

Tuesday, 17 July 2001

• RE: Resources with more than one type Hart, Lewis

Monday, 16 July 2001

• RE: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Mitch Kokar
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #2 tim finin
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #2 Thomas B. Passin
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #2 David Martin
• DAML-S expressiveness challenge #2 David Martin

Sunday, 15 July 2001

• RE: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Dickinson, Ian J
• Re: subject=predicate ? Nikita Ogievetsky
• RE: subject=predicate ? Ron Daniel
• Re: subject=predicate ? Sean B. Palmer
• RE: subject=predicate ? Ron Daniel
• RE: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Mitch Kokar
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 David Martin
• subject=predicate ? Nikita Ogievetsky

Friday, 13 July 2001

• Re: Resources with more than one type Thomas B. Passin
• Resources with more than one type Dickinson, Ian J

Wednesday, 11 July 2001

• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Thomas B. Passin
• Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Frank van Harmelen
• Re: Metamodeling Architecture of Web Ontology Languages Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 David Martin

Tuesday, 10 July 2001

• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Ian Horrocks
• Expressing quantification as a binary relation Seth Russell
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 David Martin
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 tim finin
• Re: Metamodeling Architecture of Web Ontology Languages Sean B. Palmer
• Metamodeling Architecture of Web Ontology Languages Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Richard Fikes
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Thomas B. Passin
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 pat hayes

Monday, 9 July 2001

• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Thomas B. Passin
• A proposal for extending N3 Drew McDermott
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 David Martin
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: DAML-S expressiveness challenge #1 David Martin

Friday, 6 July 2001

• Re: Can DAML class also be an instance? Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 3 July 2001

• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Ian Horrocks

Wednesday, 4 July 2001

• Second Call for Papers: KCAP 01 Markup and Annotation Workshop Siegfried Handschuh

Tuesday, 3 July 2001

• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Ken Baclawski

Wednesday, 4 July 2001

• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 3 July 2001

• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Richard Fikes

Monday, 2 July 2001

• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Ian Horrocks
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Deborah McGuinness
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Richard Fikes
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Aaron Michal
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Aaron Michal
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Aaron Michal
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Dan Connolly
• Re: A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Dan Connolly
• A Problem With The Semantics of DAML+OIL Restrictions Richard Fikes

Last message date: Thursday, 26 July 2001 20:53:11 UTC