www-rdf-logic@w3.org from February 2001 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: universal languages (Monday, 5 February)

Antonio Tomarchio

• R: Semantic Web Mining (Friday, 9 February)

Bill dehOra

• RE: universal languages (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: universal languages (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: universal languages (Friday, 2 February)

Dan Brickley

• W3C Semantic Web Activity: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: universal languages (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Thursday, 1 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: rdf:value backwards? [was: a few issues...] (Monday, 19 February)
• rdf:value backwards? [was: a few issues...] (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? (CR-48) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: Global identifiers (was: universal languages) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: Maximum cardinality of an RDF model (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: universal languages (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Maximum cardinality of an RDF model (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: universal languages (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)

Daniel Mahler

• Re: universal languages (Monday, 5 February)

Deborah McGuinness

• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Saturday, 3 February)

Drew McDermott

• Re: universal languages (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: universal languages (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)

Enrico Franconi

• CfP: Foundations of Models for Information Integration workshop (FMII-2001) (Tuesday, 27 February)

Frank van Harmelen

• Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. (Saturday, 24 February)

George Michael Pearson

• Re: Semantic Web Mining (Monday, 12 February)

Gerd Stumme

• Semantic Web Mining (Friday, 9 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. (Sunday, 25 February)
• Global identifiers (was: universal languages) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Memes of error (was: universal languages) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Representation and computation (was: universal languages) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)

Hans-Georg Stork

• IST Action Line 'Semantic Web Technologies' and OpenHouseEvent in Luxembourg (Wednesday, 28 February)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)

Jan Grant

• Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec. (Monday, 26 February)

Jim Hendler

• RE: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Thursday, 1 February)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: universal languages (Wednesday, 7 February)

Katia Sycara

• Re: universal languages (Wednesday, 7 February)

Miles Sabin

• RE: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: universal languages (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)
• RE: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)
• RE: Maximum cardinality of an RDF model (Saturday, 3 February)
• RE: Maximum cardinality of an RDF model (Saturday, 3 February)
• RE: Maximum cardinality of an RDF model (Friday, 2 February)

pat hayes

• Re: rdf:value backwards? [was: a few issues...] (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: rdf:value backwards? [was: a few issues...] (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Maximum cardinality of an RDF model (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: universal languages (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: Nunciation (Friday, 2 February)

Peter Crowther

• RE: universal languages (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concr ete types (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)
• RE: Nunciation (Saturday, 3 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: rdf:value backwards? [was: a few issues...] (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: universal languages (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)

rapoell@notionsystem.com

• RE: universal languages (Thursday, 8 February)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Friday, 16 February)
• a few issues with daml+oil+concrete (XMLSchema Datatypes) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Saturday, 3 February)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Monday, 5 February)

Sean Bechhofer

• DAML+OIL and OIL (Wednesday, 28 February)

Seth Russell

• Re: Nunciation (Friday, 2 February)

Siegfried Handschuh

• Announcement: RDF Crawler available for Download (Friday, 9 February)

Stefan Decker

• RE: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: universal languages (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download (Friday, 2 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? (Tuesday, 20 February)
• KIF to N3 (was: universal languages) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: universal languages (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types (Thursday, 1 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 11:11:53 UTC