- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:24:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: <timbl@w3.org>, <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> > Subject: Re: universal languages > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:58:43 -0500 (EST) > > > > > One might also point out that XML can "represent anything"... as can > > Unicode... > > > > dan > > > I most strongly disagree with the first part of this statement! (I also > disagree with the second part, but less strongly.) I assert that you should agree or disagree with both equally, for the mischievous sense of "represent" that I had in mind. <Blob> Dan Brickley believes that XML can represent anything, but Peter Patel-Schneider doesn't (yet) agree with him. </Blob> Dan
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2001 14:24:56 UTC