- From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:15:22 -0000
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
I wrote, > Careful here. It leaves open the cardinality of the domain of > discource of RDF+X (fill in with your favourite 'X'). But the > domain of bare RDF is at most uncountably infinite (thanks to > the clause from 2.1 quoted above) and at least uncountably > infinite (thanks to rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ...). Oops ... I should have taken my own advice and been a bit more careful. What I _meant_ was, ... But the domain of bare RDF is at most *countably* infinite (thanks to the clause from 2.1 quoted above) and at least *countably* infinite (thanks to rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ...). Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin InterX Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@interx.com http://www.interx.com/
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 19:16:08 UTC