www-archive@w3.org from January 2009 by date

Saturday, 31 January 2009

Re: HTML5 and Public Suffix Gervase Markham
Re: HTML5 and Public Suffix Gervase Markham

Friday, 30 January 2009

Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Simon Pieters
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren
[Fwd: CFP: XIIIth FEL Conference: Khorog, Tajikistan 24-26 Sept. 2009 - EL and History] Dan Brickley

Thursday, 29 January 2009

Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML5 and Public Suffix Ian Hickson
Re: HTML5 and Public Suffix Andrew Sullivan
Re: HTML5 and Public Suffix Ian Hickson
Re: HTML5 and Public Suffix Andrew Sullivan
HTML5 and Public Suffix Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Philip Taylor
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

Re: "one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Marcos Caceres
Re: "one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Marcos Caceres
Re: "one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Arthur Barstow
Re: "one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Dan Brickley
Re: "one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Thomas Roessler
Re: "one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Arthur Barstow
"one web requirement" for widgets from December workshop Thomas Roessler

Monday, 26 January 2009

HTML-WG threshold of relevance for a topic -- e.g., "certificates of anonymity" and "html sans html" Dailey, David P.

Saturday, 24 January 2009

draft TQ comment on OWL2 Jeremy Carroll
swap/check.py --report for brain anatomy test case jos.deroo@agfa.com

Friday, 23 January 2009

CURIE academy Dan Brickley

Thursday, 22 January 2009

Re: Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Sam Ruby
publishing / regrets Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

Re: Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Sam Ruby
Re: Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Sam Ruby
Re: Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 19 January 2009

Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Dan Connolly

Friday, 16 January 2009

[w3c workshop] Trust and Privacy breakout notes - Future of Social Networking Karl Dubost

Thursday, 15 January 2009

Re: PHP D2RQ/R2D2 Dan Brickley
Re: PHP D2RQ/R2D2 Alexandre Passant
PHP D2RQ/R2D2 Dan Brickley
Re: Policy for licensing Java interface files Cameron McCormack

Wednesday, 14 January 2009

[RIF][PRD] Complete Read of RIF-PRD Boley, Harold
Re: Policy for licensing Java interface files Philippe Le Hegaret
Policy for licensing Java interface files Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 10 January 2009

[Fwd: Re: [whatwg] Trying to work out the problems solved by RDFa] Dan Brickley

Thursday, 8 January 2009

cycle() proposal L. David Baron

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml" Martin Duerst

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 05:59:47 UTC