- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:23:45 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
This is mostly for the record; I'll speak to these as necessary. Various rewordings, spellings, minor typos (Jos, Art, Brian): Yes Other parsetypes (Art): Yes Amend status words (Brian): Yes Replace charter words (Brian): Yes Reword typeAttr ambiguity (Brian): Yes Re-join empty/non-empty productions: No. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0166.html My analysis: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0167.html Optional rdf:RDF (Aaron) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0168.html A new issue for Aaron? :) Maybe related to infoset [document] information item Container removal trick, confusion (Art) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0211.html Unsure, maybe ask for developer feedback - does this make containers clearer? Add/remove <ins>, <del>, css style; (X)HTML versions (DanC, Brian) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0222.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0227.html Need docs rules advice, WAI. IDs (Brian, Satoshi) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0229.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0237.html Yes, I've got it wrong here, attribute values in infoset are all CDATA, attribute type is from DTD only if present. Will redo. References (Brian) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0229.html Will check only cited docs are present. It is intended N-Triples will be cited in future, that is why it was there. Maybe now cite the draft test cases doc rather than N-Triples. Title (FrankM) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0233.html Yes, it does need changing. I suggest: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Dave
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 09:23:46 UTC