- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:23:45 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
This is mostly for the record; I'll speak to these as necessary.
Various rewordings, spellings, minor typos (Jos, Art, Brian): Yes
Other parsetypes (Art): Yes
Amend status words (Brian): Yes
Replace charter words (Brian): Yes
Reword typeAttr ambiguity (Brian): Yes
Re-join empty/non-empty productions: No.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0166.html
My analysis:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0167.html
Optional rdf:RDF (Aaron)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0168.html
A new issue for Aaron? :)
Maybe related to infoset [document] information item
Container removal trick, confusion (Art)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0211.html
Unsure, maybe ask for developer feedback - does this make
containers clearer?
Add/remove <ins>, <del>, css style; (X)HTML versions (DanC, Brian)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0222.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0227.html
Need docs rules advice, WAI.
IDs (Brian, Satoshi)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0229.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0237.html
Yes, I've got it wrong here, attribute values in infoset are all
CDATA, attribute type is from DTD only if present. Will redo.
References (Brian)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0229.html
Will check only cited docs are present.
It is intended N-Triples will be cited in future, that is why it
was there. Maybe now cite the draft test cases doc rather than
N-Triples.
Title (FrankM)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0233.html
Yes, it does need changing. I suggest: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax
Dave
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 09:23:46 UTC