W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2001

quick question/request about syntax wdraft

From: Bill de hÓra <bdehora@interx.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:21:47 +0100
To: "Rdfcore \(E-mail\)" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <69B15B675E99D411A4110008C786DA2301E97CC2@exwest_01.interx.com>
Glad we're publishing, but...I'd appreciate a
show of hands...

6.32 parseLiteral " rdf:parseType=\"Literal\""
6.33 parseResource " rdf:parseType=\"Resource\""

What would be the chances of:

1: changing them to this:

6.32 parseLiteral " rdf:parseType=\"rdf:Literal\""
6.33 parseResource " rdf:parseType=\"rdf:Resource\""

2: doing a soft deprecation on the existing
attribute values.

3: reserving the prefix 'rdf:' for future RDF rec use
in recognition of parseType's known use as an extension
mechanism plus there are words in the existing M&S that
seem to mandate this type of upgrade.

My apologies for not raising this at the telcon, but I've
been misreading the attributes as having the prefix in
there, until about 5 minutes before the telcon ended,
and I didn't want to cut into the MT discussion.

   Bill de hÓra
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 11:22:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:03 UTC