W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2018

Standardizing N3/Rules, was Re: ✅ Literals as subjects Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal

From: Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:15:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CANiy74zhrKToZmGRM6BBtBZhg0+4Ty7JP+m9t88_oXv_XrevXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Doerthe Arndt <doerthe.arndt@ugent.be>
Cc: Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>, phayes@ihmc.us, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>, Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>, Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be
Merging two threads together

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:30 AM Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote:

> On 2018-11 -25, at 02:41, Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, 02:28 Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net wrote:
>
>> However, if I should be able to make statements like this about strings,
>> why not any data type? Why not an entire RDF graph, like { { <foo> a <bar>
>> . } published “2014-02-28T00:00:00Z”^^xsd:dateTIme .  } ?
>>
>
> Very useful, +1
>
> Well that is N3.
>

>
Standardizing N3 is I think beyond the scope of David’s plea o make rdf
> more approachable. But is a good idea also.
>

and

 On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 2:40 PM Doerthe Arndt <doerthe.arndt@ugent.be>
wrote:

> Logic. We have worked with N3 for years now and there are several reasons
> why I believe that it should be standardized ...
>
> *Call to action:* who would support and/or join a W3C community group
> around an N3 rule language?
>

So far,
- Doerthe Arndt
- Jos De Roo
- Ruben Verborgh
- Nathan Rixham

Anybody else?
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 14:16:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:57 UTC