> On 2018-11 -25, at 02:41, Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, 02:28 Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net <mailto:aaa@bzfx.net> wrote: > However, if I should be able to make statements like this about strings, why not any data type? Why not an entire RDF graph, like { { <foo> a <bar> . } published “2014-02-28T00:00:00Z”^^xsd:dateTIme . } ? > > Very useful, +1 Well that is N3. $ echo " { <foo> a <bar> . } :published 2012-03-04 ." | cwm --quiet @prefix : <> . { :foo a :bar . } <#published> "2012-03-04"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date> . $ works for me Standardizing N3 is I think beyond the scope of David’s plea o make rdf more approachable. But is a good idea also. TimReceived on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 09:30:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:57 UTC