- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:37:21 -0800
- To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 21 - 2006-12-20 [VER 3] 1. Updated action item list to indicate completed items. 2. Added results of ACTION 152 to Primer discussion items. 3. Re-ordered Guidelines issues to reflect completed action items. [VER 2] 1. Changed order of Guidelines issues. 2. Added status information about F2F registration. 3. Moved Primer agenda item to end of agenda. 4. Update action item list to indicate completed items. The phone number to use for the WS-Policy WG F2F is documented on the WG's administrative home page: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#phone Participants are invited to join IRC channel #ws-policy as documented on the WG's administrative home page. Please register with Zakim: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Aug/0012.html 1. Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair a) Scribe List: Monica Martin (Scribe for Dec 20) Glen Daniels (scribe for Jan 3) Jong Lee Dimitar Angelov Sanjiva Weerawarana Ruchith Fernando Jeffrey Crump Tom Jordahl Vladislav Bezrukov ---------------------- Jeff Mischkinsky William Henry Prasad Yendluri Abbie Barbir Anthony Nadalin Ashok Malhotra Daniel Roth Sergey Beryozkin Charlton Barreto Sanka Samaranayake Frederick Hirsch Fabian Ritzmann David Orchard Toufic Boubez Yakov Sverdlov Felix Sasaki Ümit Yalçinalp Asir Vedamuthu Maryann Hondo Dale Moberg Chris Ferris Mark Little b) Scribe FAQ (Updated) Member only: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html 2. Review and approval of previous minutes, Chair http://www.w3.org/2006/12/13-ws-policy-minutes.html 3. Future WG meetings, Chair a) Next distributed meeting is Wed Jan 3 - Chair is Chris Ferris. b) Please make your plans for attending the F2F in Jan, hosted by BEA in San Francisco. http://www.w3.org/2007/01/ws-policy-f2f-logistics.html Status: 18 WG members have still not registered. What is the last date for registration? c) Future meetings http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#meetings 4. Editorial team report a) Primer and Guidelines publication, Dec 21, Felix Status: The Director has approved the publication of the FPWD of Guidelines. Target date is Thu Dec 21. b) WSDL11identifiers Editor's Draft http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html 5. Review action items, Chair Open action items - Member only: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/open ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute ("treasure island") due December 1, David Orchard DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0070.html ACTION-163 Work with Frederick to draft an example of the RM and security composition requiring nesting Umit Yalcinalp ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979 DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0071.html ACTION-165 Work with Chris and felix to draft appropriate status sections for WD Primer and FPWD Guidelines drafts Paul Cotton DONE. ACTION-166 Help drive the publication of the WD Primer and FPWD Guidelines drafts, by Dec 21 Felix Sasaki Status: In progress. ACTION-167 Follow-up with IETF regarding media type registration if we make this proposed change to the draft to accomodate XML Base Felix Sasaki DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/2006Dec/0003.html ACTION-168 Close 4039 in bugzilla Christopher Ferris DONE. ACTION-169 Make the change related to 4068 and check that update of RDDL doc after WD publication is ok Felix Sasaki DONE. ACTION-170 Work with Monica on a concrete proposal for changes to the Primer to accomodate the general sense of the proposal in issue 4069 Asir Vedamuthu ACTION-171 Raise this technical issue (form of the portType/operation/message designator) with jonathan Paul Cotton ACTION-172 Produce a proposal for resolving issue 4041 by January 10 Editors 6. Last Call Framework and Attachment Issues a) ISSUE 4069: Updating References for Use of xml:id http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4069 See note from Asir: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0041.html ACTION-170 Work with Monica on a concrete proposal for changes to the Primer to accomodate the general sense of the proposal in issue 4069 Asir Vedamuthu 7. WSDL11 Element Identifiers a) Dec Editor's Draft: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html See note from David: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0048.html b) ACTION-156 OPEN Respond to 1.1 element names topic Ashok Malhotra DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0128.html ACTION-171 Raise this technical issue (form of the portType/operation/message designator) with jonathan Paul Cotton Ashok raised the matter with the WSDL WG. See thread starting at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0058.html c) ISSUE 4045: Scoping WSDL1.1 identifiers to WS-Pol Att defined attachment points http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4045 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0031.html ACTION-162 Open an issue for the scoping of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Christopher Ferris 2006-12-13 DONE d) 'Canonical form for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers', Paul http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0028.html e) Support for operations with the same name, Fabian http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0065.html 8. Guidelines issues Status: I have re-ordered the sub-items to put these issues in the following order: a) items WG members have indicated should be "easy" to process b) items for which WG members have done further work c) items that need discussion, and d) those items which I know WG members are working on. a) 3980 The introduction section..., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3980 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0106.html b) ISSUE 3983 The Guidelines document should use a phrase to identify the target audience consistently., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3983 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0108.html c) ISSUE 3984 Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3984 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0109.html d) 3953 - Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3953 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0039.html Status: Frederick's update proposal against more recent Guidelines doc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0008.html ACTION-163 Work with Frederick to draft an example of the RM and security composition requiring nesting Umit Yalcinalp 2006-12-13 DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0066.html e) 3979 Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions, Dan Roth http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0104.html ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979 DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0071.html f) ISSUE 4072: Statements not relevant to assertion design, Dan http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0046.html Fabian's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0063.html g) ISSUE 4073: Free standing statements, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4073 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0049.html h) ISSUE 4074: Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues, Dan http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html i) ISSUE 4040: [Guidelines] Update guidelines to include discussion of ignorable, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4040 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0025.html j) 3978 Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary, Dan Roth http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0102.html Maryann's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0131.html k) 3989 Suggested format for the Guidelines document., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3989 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0113.html Maryann's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0132.html Asir: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0139.html Umit: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0141.html l) 3988 Section 8 doesn't illustrate how to design an assertion., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0112.html Email discussion thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0000.html m) ISSUE 4035: [ Guidelines] Section 2 should account for interop impact of non-wire or one-party assertions and ignorable property http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0007.html n) ISSUE (4074): [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues, Dan http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html o) 3981 What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to policy assertion design?, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3981 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0107.html n) 3986 Parameters vs. Nested Policy decision at the Domain Level?, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3986 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0110.html p) 3987 Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3987 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0111.html q) 3990 Content in Section 5.7 is unclear, Dan Roth http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3990 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0114.html 9. Primer Doc Issues a) ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute ("treasure island") due December 1, David Orchard DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0070.html b) (NEW) ISSUE 4041: Update primer to mention ignorable as needed, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0026.html ACTION-172 Produce a proposal for resolving issue 4041 by January 10 Editors 2006-12-20 10. Any other business 11. Adjourn Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 16:38:08 UTC