- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:59:54 -0500
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA866609A.237E255E-ON85257241.00603388-85257241.0078D1E6@us.ibm.com>
Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 20 - 2006-12-13 The phone number to use for the WS-Policy WG F2F is documented on the WG's administrative home page: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#phone Participants are invited to join IRC channel #ws-policy as documented on the WG's administrative home page. Please register with Zakim: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Aug/0012.html 1. Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair a) Scribe List: Mark Little (Scribe for Dec 13) Monica Martin (Scribe for Dec 20) Jong Lee Dimitar Angelov Sanjiva Weerawarana Ruchith Fernando Jeffrey Crump Tom Jordahl Vladislav Bezrukov ---------------------- Glen Daniels Jeff Mischkinsky William Henry Prasad Yendluri Abbie Barbir Anthony Nadalin Ashok Malhotra Daniel Roth Sergey Beryozkin Charlton Barreto Sanka Samaranayake Frederick Hirsch Fabian Ritzmann David Orchard Toufic Boubez Yakov Sverdlov Felix Sasaki Ümit Yalçinalp Asir Vedamuthu Maryann Hondo Dale Moberg Chris Ferris b) Scribe FAQ (Updated) Member only: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html 2. Review and approval of previous minutes, Chair http://www.w3.org/2006/12/06-ws-policy-minutes.html 3. Future WG meetings, Chair a) Next distributed meeting is Wed Dec 20 - Chair is Paul Cotton. b) Please make your plans for attending the F2F in Jan, hosted by BEA in San Francisco. c) Future meetings http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#meetings 4. Editorial team report a) Primer and Guidelines Editor's Drafts http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0005.html 5. Review action items, Chair Open action items - Member only: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/open ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute ("treasure island") due December 1, David Orchard ACTION-159 Raise an bugzilla issue on the mime type issue Felix Sasaki 2006-12-13 DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0027.html ACTION-162 Open an issue for the scoping of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Christopher Ferris 2006-12-13 DONE ACTION-163 Work with Frederick to draft an example of the RM and security composition requiring nesting Umit Yalcinalp 2006-12-13 ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979 6. Last Call Framework and Attachment Issues a) Re: Request for comments on Media Type section of "Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework" W3C Working Draft, Mark Baker http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/2006Dec/0001.html ACTION-159 Raise an bugzilla issue on the mime type issue Felix Sasaki 2006-12-13 DONE. See: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4042 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0027.html Note: this issue has been resolved b) Issue 4038: Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4038 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0024.html See note from Asir: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0034.html c) Issue 4039: WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base, Chris http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4039 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0022.html See proposal from Asir: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0040.html d) (NEW) ISSUE 4068: XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4068 See note from Felix: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0037.html Also see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0036.html e) (NEW) ISSUE 4069: Updating References for Use of xml:id http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4069 See note from Asir: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0041.html 8. WSDL11Identifiers a) Nov 24 Editor's Draft: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 b) Umit's comment on table format: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0099.html c) ACTION-156 OPEN Respond to 1.1 element names topic Ashok Malhotra DONE. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0128.html d) Paul's review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0127.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0129.html e) ISSUE 4045: Scoping WSDL1.1 identifiers to WS-Pol Att defined attachment points http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4045 See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0031.html ACTION-162 Open an issue for the scoping of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Christopher Ferris 2006-12-13 DONE 8. Primer Doc Issues a) (NEW) ISSUE 4041: Update primer to mention ignorable as needed, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0026.html 9. Guidelines issues Status: We will discuss those issues with the most discussion on the email list. a) (NEW) ISSUE 4040: [Guidelines] Update guidelines to include discussion of ignorable, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4040 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0025.html b) 3978 Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary, Dan Roth http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0102.html Maryann's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0131.html c) 3989 Suggested format for the Guidelines document., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3989 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0113.html Maryann's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0132.html Asir: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0139.html Umit: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0141.html d) 3988 Section 8 doesn't illustrate how to design an assertion., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0112.html Email discussion thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0000.html e) 3953 - Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains, Frederick http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3953 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0039.html Status: Frederick's update proposal against more recent Guidelines doc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0008.html ACTION-163 Work with Frederick to draft an example of the RM and security composition requiring nesting Umit Yalcinalp 2006-12-13 ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979 f) 3979 Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions, Dan Roth http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0104.html ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979 g) 3980 The introduction section..., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3980 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0106.html h) 3981 What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to policy assertion design?, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3981 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0107.html i) 3983 The Guidelines document should use a phrase to identify the target audience consistently., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3983 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0108.html j) 3984 Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs., Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3984 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0109.html k) 3986 Parameters vs. Nested Policy decision at the Domain Level?, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3986 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0110.html l) 3987 Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?, Asir http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3987 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0111.html m) 3990 Content in Section 5.7 is unclear, Dan Roth http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3990 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0114.html n) ISSUE 4035: [ Guidelines] Section 2 should account for interop impact of non-wire or one-party assertions and ignorable property http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0007.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0039.html 11. Any other business 12. Adjourn Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 22:00:22 UTC