public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org from January 2007 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 4072] [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design (Wednesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 4292] Intersection mode is neither defaulted nor specified (Wednesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 3953] [Guidelines] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains (Wednesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 4270] Primer versioning example (Wednesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 4292] Intersection mode is neither defaulted nor specified (Wednesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 4288] [Primer] Absence of Policy Assertions (editorial) (Tuesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 4270] Primer versioning example (Monday, 29 January)
• [Bug 4270] Primer versioning example (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4251] [WSDL11Ids] Change syntax for some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4263] [Primer] Add text to ignorable discussion on passing ignorable property of assertion to domain specific processing (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4213] [Primer] Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4040] [Guidelines] Update guidelines to include discussion of ignorable (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4212] [Guidelines] Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4103] [Primer] Questionable use of fictitious corp. name "Contoso Ltd." (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4251] [WSDL11Ids] Change syntax for some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 3953] [Guidelines] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains (Monday, 22 January)
• [Bug 4041] Update primer to mention ignorable as needed (Friday, 19 January)
• [Bug 4041] Update primer to mention ignorable as needed (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 3986] [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4263] Add text to ignorable discussion on passing ignorable property of assertion to domain specific processing (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4041] Update primer to mention ignorable as needed (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4262] [Guidelines] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4262] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4251] Change syntax for some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4238] framework spec does not formally define syntax (outline, etc) for compact form policy expression (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4196] Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4254] Change of WSP namespace to be compliant with w3c namespace policy (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4240] Title: The distribution example does not follow the axioms in Section 4.3.3 (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Bug 4255] [Primer] Section 2.9 should also explain basic attaching (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4138] Normalization Algorithm is broken (single conjunctive expressions) (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4253] [Primer] Basic Concepts section on Policy does not explain usage reasonably (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4254] Ownership of WSP namespace (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4253] Basic Concepts section on Policy does not explain usage reasonably (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4127] Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4045] scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers spec (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4045] scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers spec (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4198] Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4206] Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4045] scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers spec (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4206] Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4179] Preferences for policy expressions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4178] Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 3639] Which policy alternative was selected? (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 3639] Which policy alternative was selected? (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4045] scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers spec (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4251] Change syntax for some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4208] identifiers should use WSDL 1.1 element names not WSDL 2.0 component names (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4127] Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4240] Title: The distribution example does not follow the axioms in Section 4.3.3 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4238] framework spec does not formally define syntax (outline, etc) for compact form policy expression (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4230] normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4226] Attachment editorial issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4225] Framework editorial issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4224] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4209] Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm in merging policies (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4205] editorial nits (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4207] misleading text in section 2.2 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4204] misleading text in sect 2.3 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4203] introduction unclear and misleading (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4197] Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4195] How to ignore some of the assertions marked ?Ignorable? only? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4188] LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4177] Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4150] Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachments (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4236] personal comment not a comment from the WS-RX TC (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4236] personal comment not a comment from the WS-RX TC (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4212] Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4142] Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4213] Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4141] Policy parameter definition is not accurate (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4198] Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4230] normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 4226] Attachment editorial issues (Monday, 15 January)
• [Bug 4225] Framework editorial issues (Monday, 15 January)
• [Bug 4224] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts (Monday, 15 January)
• [Bug 4142] Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Saturday, 13 January)
• [Bug 4213] Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Saturday, 13 January)
• [Bug 4142] Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4212] Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4209] Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm in merging policies (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4196] Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4196] Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4208] identifiers should use WSDL 1.1 element names not WSDL 2.0 component names (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4127] Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4207] misleading text in section 2.2 (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4206] Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4127] Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4138] Normalization Algorithm is broken (single conjunctive expressions) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4141] Policy parameter definition is not accurate (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4142] Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4150] Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachments (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4177] Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4178] Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4179] Preferences for policy expressions (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4196] Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4197] Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4198] Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4205] editorial nits (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4204] misleading text in sect 2.3 (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4203] introduction unclear and misleading (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4198] Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4197] Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4197] Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4196] Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4196] Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• [Bug 4195] How to ignore some of the assertions marked ?Ignorable? only? (Thursday, 11 January)
• [Bug 4130] Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4128] Need references to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 component syntax (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4129] Attaching Policies to EPRs (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4188] LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4179] Preferences for policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4178] Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4177] Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [Bug 4150] Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachments (Friday, 5 January)
• [Bug 4128] Need references to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 component syntax (Wednesday, 3 January)
• [Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id (Wednesday, 3 January)
• [Bug 4142] Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 3 January)
• [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec (Wednesday, 3 January)
• [Bug 4141] Policy parameter definition is not accurate (Wednesday, 3 January)
• [Bug 4141] Policy parameter definition is not accurate (Wednesday, 3 January)
• [Bug 4138] Normalization Algorithm is broken (single conjunctive expressions) (Tuesday, 2 January)
• [Bug 4130] Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
• [Bug 4129] Attaching Policies to EPRs (Tuesday, 2 January)
• [Bug 4128] Need references to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 component syntax (Tuesday, 2 January)
• [Bug 4127] Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Tuesday, 2 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 19:04:57 UTC