- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:03:23 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4198 chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #2 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com 2007-01-17 20:03 ------- RESOLUTION: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4198 closed with proposal in http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4198#c1 as amanded by Chris here: "Although a policy assertion may be tailored for or constrained to a specific set of policy subjects by design, its semantics are not dependent upon the mechanism by which a policy expression is attached to a given policy... <fsasaki> ...subject. For instance, an assertion "Foo" has the same semantic when attached to a WSDL1.1 operation regardless of whether it was attached using XML element policy attachment or the external URI attachment mechanism." http://www.w3.org/2007/01/17-ws-policy-irc#T20-02-11 Note, the amendment merely changes one sentence and adds another to the original proposal.
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:03:28 UTC