Wednesday, 30 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
Tuesday, 29 June 2021
Monday, 28 June 2021
- [mst-content-hint] Pull Request: Improve Abstract
- Re: [mst-content-hint] degradationPreference is under-specified (#33)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Map out implementation status of getStats and make a plan (#595)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Map out implementation status of getStats and make a plan (#595)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Sunday, 27 June 2021
Saturday, 26 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Map out implementation status of getStats and make a plan (#595)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Map out implementation status of getStats and make a plan (#595)
Thursday, 24 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Share some connection infrastructure with Fetch (#73)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Receiver transform depacketizer requirements (#109)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Receiver transform depacketizer requirements (#109)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Share some connection infrastructure with Fetch (#73)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: WG-wide merge guide: the removal
- [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: WG-wide merge guide
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Receiver transform depacketizer requirements (#109)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Allow enumerateDevices() to again return audiooutput devices exposed via `selectAudioOutput()` even when "device information can be exposed" is false (#800)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Expose explicitly granted output devices even if device enumeration is off
Wednesday, 23 June 2021
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Stats table generation has failed (#606)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Fix import of WebIDL2 library
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- [mediacapture-main] Allow enumerateDevices() to again return audiooutput devices exposed via `selectAudioOutput()` even when "device information can be exposed" is false (#800)
Tuesday, 22 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats table generation has failed (#606)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unclear how URLs are processed (#2660)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unclear how URLs are processed (#2660)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Map out implementation status of getStats and make a plan (#595)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Clarify stats hierarchies (#324)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Clarify stats hierarchies (#324)
- [webrtc-stats] Stats table generation has failed (#606)
- [mediacapture-image] wide review (#282)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unclear how URLs are processed (#2660)
- [webrtc-pc] Unclear how URLs are processed (#2660)
Monday, 21 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
Saturday, 19 June 2021
Monday, 21 June 2021
Sunday, 20 June 2021
Monday, 21 June 2021
Sunday, 20 June 2021
Monday, 21 June 2021
Friday, 18 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- [webrtc-pc] Change stream associations (#2658)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add setMuted method (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] A review (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] A review (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Call the streams algorithms (#36)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Call the streams algorithms (#36)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Spec examples do processing on main thread (#28)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Spec examples do processing on main thread (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is MediaStreamTrackGenerator for audio necessary? (#31)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Is MediaStreamTrackGenerator for audio necessary? (#31)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is MediaStreamTrackProcessor for audio necessary? (#29)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Should MediaStreamTrackGenerator have an API to fine-tune MediaStreamTrack internal states? (#26)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Controlling channel mechanism is unclear (#24)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Controlling channel mechanism is unclear (#24)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add description of stability guarantees for feedback messages (#21)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Add description of stability guarantees for feedback messages (#21)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Access to raw metadata (#3)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Access to raw metadata (#3)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add a high-quality face/body tracking API to discourage poor/discriminatory implementations (#1)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Add a high-quality face/body tracking API to discourage poor/discriminatory implementations (#1)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Can one JS document hose a browser's camera capturing ability? (#37)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Can one JS document hose a browser's camera capturing ability? (#37)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Can one JS document hose a browser's camera capturing ability? (#37)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add setMuted method (#55)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Add setMuted method
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
Thursday, 17 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTCRtpSender.getCapabilities() may not return correct information in sync (#49)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Mixed-codec simulcast proposal (#43)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Fixing the spec on RTCRtpEncodingParameters.adaptivePtime. (#83)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] adaptivePtime prose unclear; concerns over lack of signaling (#74)
- [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: Fixing the spec on RTCRtpEncodingParameters.adaptivePtime.
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Merge pull request #46 from w3c/guidou/mstg-algorithms
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Update MSTG section to use stream algorithms (#53)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update MSTG section to use stream algorithms
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Update examples (#52)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update examples
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update examples
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update examples
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Update introduction to state more explicit use cases (#49)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update introduction to state more explicit use cases
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add processor algorithms (#48)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Add processor algorithms
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Remove signaling and update to security/privacy section
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Share some connection infrastructure with Fetch (#73)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Consider an API for non-delivered messages in SCTP datachannels (#50)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Define administratively prohibited in more detail (#53)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Define administratively prohibited in more detail (#53)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Share some connection infrastructure with Fetch (#73)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Share some connection infrastructure with Fetch (#73)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] What does sink mean? (#39)
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#65)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#65)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] BUNDLE-only m-sections (#66)
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] BUNDLE-only m-sections (#66)
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Network Tokens and WebRTC QoS (#68)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Network Tokens and WebRTC QoS (#68)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] (How) should we mitigate error code exploits? (#70)
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] (How) should we mitigate error code exploits? (#70)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] (How) should we mitigate error code exploits? (#70)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add RTOMax to RTCDataChannelInit (#71)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] adaptivePtime prose unclear; concerns over lack of signaling (#74)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] adaptivePtime prose unclear; concerns over lack of signaling (#74)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] adaptivePtime prose unclear; concerns over lack of signaling (#74)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Tests for Transferable DataChannels (#82)
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Tests for Transferable DataChannels (#82)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
Wednesday, 16 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarification needed on ended HTMLMediaElement with MediaStream becoming active (#519)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add MediaStreamTrack section. (#33)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Update privacy/security considerations (#42)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackGenerator is underspecified (#25)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
Tuesday, 15 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Update MSTG section to use more algorithms (#46)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update MSTG section
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update examples
Monday, 14 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: State use cases explicitly
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Saturday, 12 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
Friday, 11 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Use the displaySurface constraint to signal application preference
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Fix unclosed <a> tag. (#185)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Editorial: Fix unclosed <a> tag.
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaHandlerStats.remoteSource description (#604)
- [webrtc-stats] MediaStatsHandler.remoteSource should be true in case of receiver (#605)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: RTCMediaHandlerStats.remoteSource description
Thursday, 10 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Conditional Suppression of Local Audio Playback from Captured Tab (#161)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] WebRTC-Extensions Implementation Status (#80)
- [webrtc-extensions] Tests for Transferable DataChannels (#82)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Editorial: don't link in dfns (#2649)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Editorial: don't link in dfns (#2649)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Create RTCPeerConnections in workers (#77)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: remove/link dependencies
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Readable algorithms
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Update privacy/security considerations
Wednesday, 9 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] what metadata is useful? (#9)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] what metadata is useful? (#9)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] what metadata is useful? (#9)
Tuesday, 8 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Remove control signals (#40)
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Remove control signals
- [mediacapture-transform] Pull Request: Remove control signals
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
Monday, 7 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Conditional Suppression of Local Audio Playback from Captured Tab (#161)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarification needed on ended HTMLMediaElement with MediaStream becoming active (#519)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Saturday, 5 June 2021
Friday, 4 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add 'privacy and security' section (#141)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] What does sink mean? (#39)
- [mediacapture-transform] What does sink mean? (#39)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Expose SFrame errors through SFrameTransform.onerror (#103)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Expose SFrame errors through SFrameTransform.onerror (#103)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Update auto-publish.yml (#120)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] chore: use specprod v2 (#183)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: chore: use specprod v2
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Update auto-publish.yml (#120)
- [mediacapture-output] Pull Request: Update auto-publish.yml
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Like to use promise to return recorded data (#75)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Like to use promise to return recorded data (#75)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] WG CR review for mediacapture-record (#72)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder specification expects to synchronously know the list of supported mime types (#202)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Is there any implementer objection to supporting audio/wav mimeType? (#198)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Is there any implementer objection to supporting audio/wav mimeType? (#198)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Fill Security & Privacy questionnaire (#122)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Fill Security & Privacy questionnaire (#122)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Promise version of requestData? (#137)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Promise version of requestData? (#137)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Why is start 5.3 in the specification? (#168)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Why is start 5.3 in the specification? (#168)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Update to constructor operations (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Update to constructor operations (#182)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Use non-abbreviated terms in bitrates (#203)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Use non-abbreviated terms in bitrates (#203)
Thursday, 3 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Recognize safer & better-integrated web presentations in getDisplayMedia (#182)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define the suppressLocalAudioPlayback constraint (#164)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Audio is said to be optional but there's one place that implies that it is not (#101)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consistently capitalize user agent (#179)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Fix capitalization of "User Agent"
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Elaborate MediaTrackCapabilities extensions (#174)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] MediaTrackCapabilities (#93)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] restrictOwnAudio is missing from MediaTrackSettings (#176)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Should restrictOwnAudio be settable? (#180)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] overconstrained event is referenced in "Constrainable Properties for Captured Display Surfaces" (#168)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Possible duplication of requirements (#125)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Consistently capitalize user agent (#179)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: "capture capture" in doc is probably a typo (#172)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Consistently capitalize user agent (#179)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] The user agent should be allowed to change sources after getDisplayMedia() resolves (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-charter] Move -extensions rules from webrtc-pc to charter repo (#63)
- [webrtc-charter] Move -extensions rules from webrtc-pc to charter repo (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should mute and unmute events of MediaStreamTrack be allowed to fire based on user non-action? (#141)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove reference to obsolete event
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Tweak DisplayMediaStreamConstraints language
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Use xref, avoid data-cite="html" (#792)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] restrictOwnAudio is missing from MediaTrackSettings (#176)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Possible duplication of requirements (#125)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Possible duplication of requirements (#125)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove unintended requirement that audio be included
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Elaborate MediaTrackCapabilities extensions
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define MediaDevices.CaptureHandle (#163)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
Wednesday, 2 June 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Use xref, avoid data-cite="html" (#792)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Use xref link for HTMLMediaElement.play
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
Tuesday, 1 June 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.constructor(). (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] A review (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Controlling channel mechanism is unclear (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Why are arbitrary values disallowed for hints? (#47)
- Closed: [mst-content-hint] Why are arbitrary values disallowed for hints? (#47)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Controlling channel mechanism is unclear (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Controlling channel mechanism is unclear (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] A review (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Controlling channel mechanism is unclear (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackProcessor threading model is underspecified (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Identification of Captured Application By Capturer (#166)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Update to latest ReSpec version (#2653)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Update to latest ReSpec version (#789)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Media capture accidentally redefines Navigator (#791)