- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 17:05:24 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
@alvestrand In order to not waste the WG's time, I believe it is customary to introduce new information with such requests, is it not? Simply asking for a re-vote doesn't seem productive, because what would make a different outcome likely? > The argument is that the WG decision was based on wrong information and an inadequate security evaluation, ... A discovery that old information is wrong might qualify as new information, if it can be substantiated. Would you be able to point out prose in the [spec](https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-screen-share/) or its [security questionnaire](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/blob/gh-pages/questionnaire.md) that is wrong? -- GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/issues/184#issuecomment-860080934 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 12 June 2021 17:05:57 UTC