public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from September 2020 by author

Bernard Aboba via GitHub

• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Saturday, 26 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 24 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Make the set of transports for a PC obvious (#2563) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 3 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Update Perfect Negotiation example to have the boolean (#2566) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba (Tuesday, 1 September)

Brad Isbell via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Thursday, 3 September)

caribouW3 via GitHub

• [webrtc-priority] Wide review (#16) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mst-content-hint] Wide review (#44) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by caribouW3 (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-priority] Need to specify default priority and what to do about it (#12) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Dan Jenkins via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub

• [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Update patent policy text (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Align with other specifications (non-normative changes) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Update to latest ReSpec version (#728) (Monday, 28 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Update to latest ReSpec version (#2582) (Monday, 28 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version (Monday, 28 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Set up repo for auto-publication and automatic respec upgrade (Thursday, 24 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Thursday, 24 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Publish automatically updates to the document as CR Drafts (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Stopping senders and receivers: Present or absent? (#2579) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [webrtc-insertable-streams] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Incorporate proposed editorial improvement from AC review (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Update to latest ReSpec version (#2575) (Monday, 21 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Monday, 7 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Monday, 7 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Message text not localizable (#1605) (Friday, 4 September)
• [webrtc-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Fix a few editorial aspects (Tuesday, 1 September)

Eero Häkkinen via GitHub

• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Fix dictionary name and minus sign typos (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Note that required constraints are not allowed for device selection (Wednesday, 30 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Remove a request permission to use algorithm note (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Reject with TypeError on required PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow PTZ support to be always exposed in capabilities (#260) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Allow PTZ support to be always exposed in capabilities (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 1 September)

François Beaufort via GitHub

• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Fix nits in PTZ example (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Replace OverConstrainedError with TypeError (#264) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Replace OverConstrainedError with TypeError (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow PTZ support to be always exposed in capabilities (#260) (Friday, 25 September)
• Closed: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Enforcing user gesture for getUserMedia in case of PTZ request (#254) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify pan/tilt/zoom settings (#245) (#249) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow empty PTZ capabilities without PTZ permission (#259) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow empty PTZ capabilities without PTZ permission (#259) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow only ideal PTZ constraints in gUM (#258) (Monday, 21 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Allow empty PTZ capabilities without PTZ permission (Thursday, 17 September)
• [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Allow only ideal PTZ constraints in gUM (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Update examples using modern JS. (#253) (Tuesday, 8 September)

github-actions[bot] via GitHub

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version (Monday, 28 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version (Monday, 21 September)

guest271314 via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Default device selection and listing inconsistencies (#727) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] default audio output should be first in the enumerateDevice returned list (#113) (Sunday, 27 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Default device selection and listing inconsistencies (#727) (Sunday, 27 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102) (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102) (Sunday, 13 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] Add an algorithm to expose audio output devices through enumerateDevices (#109) (Saturday, 12 September)
• [mediacapture-output] Rename selectAudioOutput: This specification does not define capture of headphones or speakers (#111) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] [Feature] registerStream(deviceId = '0', stream = MediaStream) (#712) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Monday, 7 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] capture screenshot of DOM (#145) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Broader API proposals for device selection and permissions (#719) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)

guidou via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] default audio output should be first in the enumerateDevice returned list (#113) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702) (Thursday, 3 September)

Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Publish automatically updates to the document as CR Drafts (#2580) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Stopping senders and receivers: Present or absent? (#2579) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] RTCSctpTransport is missing transportId (#582) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Define the set of transports for all connection state enums (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Point out that null mid+index only applies to end-of-candidates (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [webrtc-priority] Pull Request: Default RTCDataChannelInit.priority to "low" (Monday, 21 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-priority] Move wpt tests to new directory (#8) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webrtc-priority] Move wpt tests to new directory (#8) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [webrtc-priority] Security and Privacy Questionnaire (#3) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webrtc-priority] Security and Privacy Questionnaire (#3) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-priority] Security and Privacy Questionnaire (#3) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721) (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webrtc-priority] Pull Request: Security and Privacy section (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Finding associated audio and video tracks? (#574) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mst-content-hint] Why are arbitrary values disallowed for hints? (#47) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571) (Wednesday, 2 September)

henbos via GitHub

• Closed: [webrtc-extensions] TAG review for playoutDelay (#51) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] TAG review for playoutDelay (#51) (Friday, 25 September)
• [webrtc-extensions] TAG review for playoutDelay (#51) (Friday, 25 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 24 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Stopping senders and receivers: Present or absent? (#2579) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Publish automatically updates to the document as CR Drafts (#2580) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 24 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] End-to-end delay metrics (#537) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Should remote-inbound-rtp contain bytesReceived? (#584) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Should remote-inbound-rtp contain bytesReceived? (#584) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• [webrtc-stats] Should remote-inbound-rtp contain bytesReceived? (#584) (Monday, 21 September)
• [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Identify the list of allowed required constraints for getUserMedia (#707) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Friday, 11 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Provide guidelines to persist capture transition indicators for long enough (#724) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Finding associated audio and video tracks? (#574) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Finding associated audio and video tracks? (#574) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• [webrtc-stats] RTCSctpTransport is missing transportId (#582) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add Henrik B to the list of editors (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix Perfect Negotiation (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Update Perfect Negotiation example to have the boolean (#2566) (Thursday, 3 September)

hills via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Broader API proposals for device selection and permissions (#719) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub

• Closed: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Reject with TypeError on required PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Update examples using modern JS. (#253) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 3 September)
• [mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-output] Reference webidl properly to fix respec errors. (#110) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702) (Thursday, 3 September)

Johannes Bergman via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-image] Missing MediaTrack Settings (#208) (Wednesday, 30 September)

Josh Ribakoff via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-stats] End-to-end delay metrics (#537) (Tuesday, 8 September)

Julian Klug via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Saturday, 5 September)

Julien Isorce via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Issue 38 - Cursor constraint (#58) (Saturday, 12 September)

Kristen Chapman via GitHub

• [mst-content-hint] PING Review (#51) (Friday, 11 September)
• Closed: [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50) (Friday, 11 September)
• [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Lennart Grahl via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Philipp Hancke via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574) (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (Thursday, 10 September)

Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub

• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Closed: [mediacapture-image] Document OverConstrainedError for PTZ in explainer (#229) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Closed: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252) (Friday, 25 September)
• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252) (Friday, 4 September)
• [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju (Friday, 4 September)
• Closed: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Friday, 4 September)

Sangwhan \

• [mediacapture-record] Use non-abbreviated terms in bitrates (#203) (Wednesday, 23 September)

Sean DuBois via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] addIceCandidate may not need to throw an error when no remoteDescription (#2519) (Sunday, 20 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571) (Thursday, 3 September)
• [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL (spec and implementation differ) (#2571) (Tuesday, 1 September)

ShikChen via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)

Solomon Boulos via GitHub

• [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Varun Singh via GitHub

• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Thursday, 17 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Clarify that remote-[in/out]bound-rtp.ssrc refers to the localId's ssrc (#454) (Thursday, 17 September)
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Describe what we mean by ssrc for remote stats. (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Flatten the stats hierarchy (#533) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] End-to-end delay metrics (#537) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Monday, 7 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Define reception time for jitterBufferDelay stat (#549) (Monday, 7 September)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Monday, 7 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add Henrik to the editor list (#579) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Add Henrik B to the list of editors (#581) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] Add Henrik to the editor list (#579) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webrtc-stats] playout delay (#568) (Friday, 4 September)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Friday, 4 September)
• Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add appendix with flattened stats hierarchies? (#577) (Friday, 4 September)
• [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Friday, 4 September)

youennf via GitHub

• [webrtc-insertable-streams] Consider using TransformStreams instead of exposing ReadableStream/WritableStream (#48) (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by youennf (Tuesday, 29 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Identify the list of allowed required constraints for getUserMedia (#707) (Tuesday, 29 September)
• [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Monday, 28 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261) (Thursday, 24 September)
• [mediacapture-output] default audio output should be first in the enumerateDevice returned list (#113) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725) (Friday, 18 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725) (Friday, 18 September)
• [mediacapture-output] Rename setSinkId to setAudioOutput (#112) (Friday, 18 September)
• [mediacapture-image] If PTZ permission is required, PTZ devices should be selected by getUserMedia (#262) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640) (Monday, 14 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Provide guidelines to persist capture transition indicators for long enough (#724) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721) (Wednesday, 9 September)
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Broader API proposals for device selection and permissions (#719) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256) (Tuesday, 1 September)
• Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 20:07:06 UTC