[Bug 18645] [Shadow]: HTMLSelectElement should have an insertion point
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 19804] New: relatedTarget on blur/focus should match focusout/focusin
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18424] Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012)
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 19790] New: [Custom]: Consider bulk register algorithm
[Bug 19789] New: [Custom]: Consider ditching HTMLSpanElement as assumed base element
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18747] [Custom]: Specify invoking "created" callback
[Bug 18637] iOS version
[Bug 16302] possible unnecessary insertion of U+0020 SPACE in mime type expression
[Bug 14600] Spec element.setCapture / document.releaseCapture
[Bug 17659] XML lacks native hypermedia affordances, which makes attainment of it's #1 goal impossible
[Bug 14347] Consider "createContextualFragment in detached contexts" thread
[Bug 13410] XML serialisation incompletely defined.
[Bug 14842] Update createContextualFragment if detached flag is removed
[Bug 14694] innerHTML in DocumentFragment
[Bug 14218] Check CharData when serializing Text
[Bug 12584] outerHTML should probably merge with adjacent text nodes if applicable. IE seems to do this to some extent, and WebKit just changed to do it: <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52686> This test shows behavior for outerText and outerHTML: <http://so
[Bug 15916] DOMParser Document origin
[Bug 11190] Make scripts created by createContextualFragment() executable
[Bug 15902] DOMParser created documents should use about:blank as URL
[Bug 16682] Don't throw for ]]> with serializeAsCDATA
[Bug 19778] New: Wrong regex for integer
[Bug 19777] New: Grammar issue with qualified operations
[Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
[Bug 19771] New: Need way to determine what keys are supported on device.
[Bug 18738] [Custom]: Specify that type selectors match all derived types
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 18740] [Custom]: Specify semantics of handling document.register options
[Bug 18738] [Custom]: Specify that type selectors match all derived types
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 18732] [Custom]: element upgrade algorithm does not preserve attributes and children
[Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
[Bug 18732] [Custom]: element upgrade algorithm does not preserve attributes and children
[Bug 18732] [Custom]: element upgrade algorithm does not preserve attributes, event listeners, references
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 19763] New: [Custom]: Consider copying event listeners when upgrading elements
- [Bug 19763] [Custom]: Consider copying event listeners when upgrading elements
- [Bug 19763] [Custom]: Consider copying event listeners when upgrading elements
[Bug 18738] [Custom]: Specify that type selectors match all derived types
[Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 18540] Proposal for a new acceptNode() return value for TreeWalker.
[Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
[Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
[Bug 19727] New: [Shadow]: Remove magic from tree composition algorithm
- [Bug 19727] [Shadow]: Remove magic from tree composition algorithm
- [Bug 19727] [Shadow]: Remove magic from tree composition algorithm
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 19721] New: [Custom]: Change "template" argument to DocumentFragment
- [Bug 19721] [Custom]: Change "template" argument to DocumentFragment
- [Bug 19721] [Custom]: Change "template" argument to DocumentFragment
[Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
[Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
[Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
[Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 18719] [Custom]: Specify declarative syntax for defining custom DOM elements
[Bug 18914] [Custom]: <element> description should be aware of dynamic insertion
[Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
[Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18914] [Custom]: <element> description should be aware of dynamic insertion
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18847] [Custom]: Typo in Introduction, definiton → definition
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18845] [Custom]: Extensions to Document interface create dependencies on HTML from DOM
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18844] [Custom]: Typo in the title of Section 9, Intefaces → Interfaces
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18843] [Custom]: prototype construction algorithm is defined, but not used anywhere
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18841] [Custom]: "extends" is an ECMAScript reserved word; don’t use it as an attribute name
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18842] [Custom]: Custom element instantiation creates older ShadowRoots for more derived types, which is counterintuitive
[Bug 18841] [Custom]: "extends" is an ECMAScript reserved word; don’t use it as an attribute name
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18776] substeps 3-5 of the prototype construction algorithm should be main steps 4-6
[Bug 18596] [Custom]: Use a "has a" relationship instead of "is a" for custom types
[Bug 18511] [Custom]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18914] [Custom]: <element> description should be aware of dynamic insertion
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
[Bug 18847] [Custom]: Typo in Introduction, definiton → definition
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18845] [Custom]: Extensions to Document interface create dependencies on HTML from DOM
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18844] [Custom]: Typo in the title of Section 9, Intefaces → Interfaces
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18843] [Custom]: prototype construction algorithm is defined, but not used anywhere
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18842] [Custom]: Custom element instantiation creates older ShadowRoots for more derived types, which is counterintuitive
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 18841] [Custom]: "extends" is an ECMAScript reserved word; don’t use it as an attribute name
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
[Bug 18776] substeps 3-5 of the prototype construction algorithm should be main steps 4-6
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 19690] New: [Shadow]: Specification is not complete about nodes types & shadow insertion points
- [Bug 19690] [Shadow]: Specification is not complete about nodes types & shadow insertion points
- [Bug 19690] [Shadow]: Specification is not complete about nodes types & shadow insertion points
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19685] New: [Shadow]: We need comment about "scope" for shadow reference combinator.
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19684] New: [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16009] [Shadow]: Specify how CSS behaves in shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 17516] [Shadow]: Investigate a more thorough set of selectors to traverse shadow DOM
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18429] [Shadow]: Specify imperative API for node distribution
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 17515] [Shadow]: @host and shadow insertion point
[Bug 17143] [Shadow]: Consider explicitly exporting CSS Variables across a shadow boundary
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18435] [Shadow]: Needs consistent way to style the inner element of replaced elements.
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 19681] New: [Shadow]: Refactor styles to get rid of rule applicability
- [Bug 19681] [Shadow]: Refactor styles to get rid of rule applicability
- [Bug 19681] [Shadow]: Refactor styles to get rid of rule applicability
- [Bug 19681] [Shadow]: Refactor styles to get rid of rule applicability
- [Bug 19681] [Shadow]: Refactor styles to get rid of rule applicability
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 19680] New: [Shadow]: Refactor styles in terms of outer and inner tree
- [Bug 19680] [Shadow]: Refactor styles in terms of outer and inner tree
- [Bug 19680] [Shadow]: Refactor styles in terms of outer and inner tree
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15196] [Shadow]: Specify a way of explicitly allowing some styles reaching into shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 19675] New: [Shadow]: Add a node regarding constructable CSSStyleSheet
- [Bug 19675] [Shadow]: Add a note regarding constructable CSSStyleSheet
- [Bug 19675] [Shadow]: Add a note regarding constructable CSSStyleSheet
- [Bug 19675] [Shadow]: Add a note regarding constructable CSSStyleSheet
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19672] New: [Shadow]: The use of the word "variables" is somewhat confusing.
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16317] [Shadow]: Clarify the meaning of /select/ and upper boundary encapsulation, styling
[Bug 16009] [Shadow]: Specify how CSS behaves in shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19663] New: [Shadow]: Who uses a '/select/ reference combinator'? A component author or a component user?
- [Bug 19663] [Shadow]: Who uses a '/select/ reference combinator'? A component author or a component user?
- [Bug 19663] [Shadow]: Who uses a '/select/ reference combinator'? A component author or a component user?
- [Bug 19663] [Shadow]: Who uses a '/select/ reference combinator'? A component author or a component user?
[Bug 14949] [Meta]: Component Model needs an Explainer document
[Bug 19657] New: [Explainer]: Typo "reset-style-inherifance"
[Bug 15954] [Shadow]: The dilemma of document DOM tree mutations
[Bug 15196] [Shadow]: Specify a way of explicitly allowing some styles reaching into shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18653] wrong bug tracker link
[Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
[Bug 18188] "relevant namespace object" is not defined in WebIDL anymore.
[Bug 18218] Within the workers text "list of active intervals" can be removed because it is the same as "list of active timers".
[Bug 18080] "This specification introduces two related mechanisms, similar to HTTP session cookies, for storing structured data on the client side." - structured data is no longer supported
[Bug 18033] each MessageChannel acts as its own task source. This means that messages sent using this function are not guaranteed to execute in order, since the order task sources are processed isn't specified.
[Bug 18045] Based on my experience and from reading many questions on the Web, this API is seriously flawed. It treats cross-domain iframes the same as same-domain iframes, except that almost every operation on contentWindow is an error.
[Bug 18610] Transferable should expose a close() method
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19642] New: [Shadow]: WebIDL issues
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19581] New: [Shadow]: Specify a way to access the list of currently distributed nodes for a given insertion point
- [Bug 19581] [Shadow]: Specify a way to access the list of currently distributed nodes for a given insertion point
- [Bug 19581] [Shadow]: Specify a way to access the list of currently distributed nodes for a given insertion point
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19571] New: .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
[Bug 19570] New: Editorial: typo U+00A (missing a 0)
[Bug 18753] [Shadow]: Introduce HTMLContentElement projection API
[Bug 19003] Bugs in toNativeLineEndings()
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19567] New: [Templates]: content should disallow assignment with ShadowRoot
[Bug 15102] [Shadow]: Consider renaming <content> element to <children> element.
[Bug 16904] [Shadow]: Consider better aligning with or just plain moving ShadowRoot interface to DOM spec
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 15102] [Shadow]: Consider renaming <content> element to <children> element.
[Bug 16904] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot interface
[Bug 16903] [Shadow]: File bugs and elide the Terminology section into dependent specifications
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15409] [Shadow]: Consider exposing shadow DOM subtree stack in the API
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 19562] New: [Shadow]: Consider making shadow DOM subtrees public by default
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15196] [Shadow]: Specify a way of explicitly allowing some styles reaching into shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 15196] [Shadow]: Specify a way of explicitly allowing some styles reaching into shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 15555] Figure out which feature strings should be supported
[Bug 13044] Define Node.compareDocumentPosition
[Bug 19555] New: Node.getDocumentPosition should return 0x23 or 0x25 for disconnected nodes, not 0x01
- [Bug 19555] Node.getDocumentPosition should return 0x23 or 0x25 for disconnected nodes, not 0x01
- [Bug 19555] Node.getDocumentPosition should return 0x23 or 0x25 for disconnected nodes, not 0x01
- [Bug 19555] Node.getDocumentPosition should return 0x23 or 0x25 for disconnected nodes, not 0x01
- [Bug 19555] Node.getDocumentPosition should return 0x23 or 0x25 for disconnected nodes, not 0x01
[Bug 17758] Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
[Bug 16953] createObjectURL and oneTimeOnly behavior should be defined in terms of stable state
[Bug 17758] Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
[Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
[Bug 18529] Existence of separators in token should throw SyntaxError
[Bug 18528] Spec is unclear about the case sensitivity of parameter values
[Bug 18523] Spec is unclear about the restriction on LWS in the attribute/value in the ABNF for media-type
[Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
[Bug 18867] Web developers cannot know whether a key event will cause text input actually
[Bug 19540] New: Firing WebStorage storage event
[Bug 15555] Figure out which feature strings should be supported
[Bug 15555] Figure out which feature strings should be supported
[Bug 15555] Figure out which feature strings should be supported
[Bug 15555] Figure out which feature strings should be supported
[Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
[Bug 15994] origin attribute
[Bug 19508] New: "The nextSibling() method must traverse children..."
- [Bug 19508] "The nextSibling() method must traverse children..."
- [Bug 19508] "The nextSibling() method must traverse children..."
[Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
[Bug 19502] New: [Custom]: HTMLElementElement::constructor shadows JS constructor property
- [Bug 19502] [Custom]: HTMLElementElement::constructor shadows JS constructor property
- [Bug 19502] [Custom]: HTMLElementElement::constructor shadows JS constructor property
- [Bug 19502] [Custom]: HTMLElementElement::constructor shadows JS constructor property
[Bug 19488] New: [Templates]: Consider explanatory examples which motivate the various parser changes
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19487] New: [Templates]: Consider re-writing the foster-parenting as an algorithm
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19486] New: [Templates]: Parsing spec defines "current table" in terms of the fragment case
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19485] New: [Templates]: The "in table" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19485] [Templates]: The "in table" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19485] [Templates]: The "in table" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
[Bug 19470] New: Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
- [Bug 19470] Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
- [Bug 19470] Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
- [Bug 19470] Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
[Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
[Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
[Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
[Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
[Bug 16707] user/password set to undefined means missing
[Bug 10326] make "user:password" in URLs a SYNTAX_ERR
[Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
[Bug 19463] New: MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
- [Bug 19463] MutationRecord added/removedNodes could return empty array, not null
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19456] New: [Templates]: The "in table body" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19456] [Templates]: The "in table body" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19456] [Templates]: The "in table body" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
[Bug 18796] HTTP 204 not specified
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19455] New: [Templates]: The "in row" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19455] [Templates]: The "in row" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19455] [Templates]: The "in row" insertion need to be clear there are states which can now be entered while parsing template contents
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 18796] HTTP 204 not specified
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 18796] HTTP 204 not specified
[Bug 15495] Update EventSource model to do automatic reconnect even in the face of network errors
[Bug 15495] Update EventSource model to do automatic reconnect even in the face of network errors
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 19450] New: [IndexedDB] Key path segments should permit reserved words
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 19436] New: [Shadow]: Specify fallback content behavior during reprojection
- [Bug 19436] [Shadow]: Specify fallback content behavior during reprojection
- [Bug 19436] [Shadow]: Specify fallback content behavior during reprojection
[Bug 18463] DOMTokenList enable
[Bug 18463] DOMTokenList enable
[Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
[Bug 18463] DOMTokenList enable
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 19431] New: Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19415] New: [Templates]: Need parser rules to prevent <html> within <template> from merging attributes with the document's <html>
- [Bug 19415] [Templates]: Need parser rules to prevent <html> within <template> from merging attributes with the document's <html>
- [Bug 19415] [Templates]: Need parser rules to prevent <html> within <template> from merging attributes with the document's <html>
[Bug 19414] New: Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
- [Bug 19414] Implement finishPropagation() method
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19408] New: [Templates]: in frameset needs rule to detect </frameset> while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19408] [Templates]: in frameset needs rule to detect </frameset> while parsing template contents
- [Bug 19408] [Templates]: in frameset needs rule to detect </frameset> while parsing template contents
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 19404] New: <shadow> nodes should re-project just like <content>
- [Bug 19404] <shadow> nodes should re-project just like <content>
- [Bug 19404] <shadow> nodes should re-project just like <content>
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19403] New: [Templates]: "in body" needs a rule to handle <body> while parsing template
- [Bug 19403] [Templates]: "in body" needs a rule to handle <body> while parsing template
- [Bug 19403] [Templates]: "in body" needs a rule to handle <body> while parsing template
[Bug 19402] New: MutationSummary: When appending a record to the queue the last item needs to be replaced if it represents the same mutation and the new record has an oldValue
- [Bug 19402] MutationObservers: When appending a record to the queue the last item needs to be replaced if it represents the same mutation and the new record has an oldValue
- [Bug 19402] MutationObservers: When appending a record to the queue the last item needs to be replaced if it represents the same mutation and the new record has an oldValue
- [Bug 19402] MutationObservers: When appending a record to the queue the last item needs to be replaced if it represents the same mutation and the new record has an oldValue
- [Bug 19402] MutationObservers: When appending a record to the queue the last item needs to be replaced if it represents the same mutation and the new record has an oldValue
[Bug 19400] New: [Shadow]: Specify insertion points in terms of "display:contents"
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18772] Should getAllResponseHeaders() end with \r\n?
[Bug 18772] Should getAllResponseHeaders() end with \r\n?
[Bug 17222] treat status code 308 consistently with 301, 302, and 307
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[Bug 19110] DOM "throw" algorithm doesn't seem to use WebIDL "throw" algorithm correctly
[Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
[Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
[Bug 14600] Spec element.setCapture / document.releaseCapture
[Bug 16302] possible unnecessary insertion of U+0020 SPACE in mime type expression
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- [Bug 19297] May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- [Bug 19297] May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- [Bug 19297] May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- [Bug 19297] May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- [Bug 19297] May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- [Bug 19297] May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
[Bug 14949] [Meta]: Component Model needs an Explainer document
[Bug 19289] New: [Explainer]: Typo
[Bug 19283] New: Investigate IDNA2003 separators
- [Bug 19283] Investigate IDNA2003 separators
- [Bug 19283] Investigate IDNA2003 separators
- [Bug 19283] Investigate IDNA2003 separators
- [Bug 19283] Investigate IDNA2003 separators
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 16341] [Templates]: [Non-normative] Clarify that template contents cannot be matched against "selector" queries in their host documents.
[Bug 16341] [Templates]: [Non-normative] Clarify that template contents cannot be matched against "selector" queries in their host documents.
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 16280] [Templates]: [Non-normative] Clarify the behavior of Node/Element mutation, traversal & serialize/deserialize APIs on <template>
[Bug 16280] [Templates]: [Non-normative] Clarify the behavior of Node/Element mutation, traversal & serialize/deserialize APIs on <template>
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 19276] New: [Shadow]: Consider simplifying addStyleSheet parameters
- [Bug 19276] [Shadow]: Consider simplifying addStyleSheet parameters
- [Bug 19276] [Shadow]: Consider simplifying addStyleSheet parameters
- [Bug 19276] [Shadow]: Consider simplifying addStyleSheet parameters
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 16787] [Templates]: Specify that XML parsing doesn't do anything special with <template>
[Bug 16787] [Templates]: Specify that XML parsing doesn't do anything special with <template>
[Bug 16787] [Templates]: Specify that XML parsing doesn't do anything special with <template>
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 18672] [Templates]: Define the behavior of cloneNode(deep) on template elements
[Bug 18672] [Templates]: Define the behavior of cloneNode(deep) on template elements
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 18735] [Templates]: Section 7 Parsing HTML Templates needs to be clear to be specific about ownerDocument WRT templates
[Bug 18735] [Templates]: Section 7 Parsing HTML Templates needs to be clear to be specific about ownerDocument WRT templates
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 16904] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot interface
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 17143] [Shadow]: Consider explicitly exporting CSS Variables across a shadow boundary
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 16903] [Shadow]: Terminology
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15409] [Shadow]: Consider exposing shadow DOM subtree stack in the API
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18645] [Shadow]: HTMLSelectElement should have an insertion point
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18429] [Shadow]: Specify imperative API for node distribution
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 17516] [Shadow]: Investigate a more thorough set of selectors to traverse shadow DOM
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 17515] [Shadow]: @host and shadow insertion point
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 17447] [Shadow]: What happens when ShadowRoot instantiated from a different context?
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 15611] [Shadow]: Consider element.createShadowRoot as API for creating ShadowRoot objects.
[Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
[Bug 18912] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot needs to support elementFromPoint
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
[Bug 18435] [Shadow]: Needs consistent way to style the inner element of replaced elements.
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18513] [Shadow]: Consider re-projecting children in nested shadow DOM subtrees
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 18608] [Templates] Specify that all template elements within a document have DF's that are owned by a shared browsing-context-less document
[Bug 18608] [Templates] Specify that all template elements within a document have DF's that are owned by a shared browsing-context-less document
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18704] [Shadow]: How reset-style-inheritance flag of insertion point works with multiple show roots
[Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
[Bug 18415] [Shadow]: Focus navigation and distributed nodes
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 18614] [Templates]: Need to outline parser changes required to allow <template> to occur anywhere with <head> or <body>
[Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
[Bug 19237] New: [Templates]: Specify "inertness" in terms of browsing-context-less owner document
- [Bug 19237] [Templates]: Specify "inertness" in terms of browsing-context-less owner document
- [Bug 19237] [Templates]: Specify "inertness" in terms of browsing-context-less owner document