- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:04:00 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18704
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #3 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-10-03 22:03:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thank you for comments.
>
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Can you help me understand the question a bit better? For this configuration:
>
> Sure.
>
> >
> > [#host]--[SR-4]->[shadow#4]
> > | [SR-3]->[shadow#3]
> > | [SR-2]->[shadow#2]
> > | [SR-1]->[shadow#1]
> > +->[span]
> >
> > The reset-style-inheritance applies at whichever <shadow> element it is set.
>
> I see.
> SR-4 is the oldest shadow root and SR-1 is the youngest shadow root, I think.
The other way around :) 4 was added last, it's the youngest.
>
> > For example, in this case:
> >
> >
> > [#host]--[SR-4]->[style#a]
> > | |
> > | +->[shadow#4]
> > |
> > | [SR-3]->[style#b]
> > | |
> > | +->[shadow#3]
> > |
> > | [SR-2]->[style#c]
> > | |
> > | +->[shadow#2]
> > |
> > | [SR-1]->[style#d]
> > | |
> > | +->[shadow#1]
> > +->[span]
> >
> > answering the question whether a style from [style#a] inherits to [span]
> > depends on whether there are any reset-inheritance-flags in [SR-3], [SR-2], or
> > [SR-1].
>
> I agree about reset-inheritance-flags of shadow roots.
>
> So how do reset-inheritance-flags of insertion points work? c.f.
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html#shadow-element
>
> The following is my understanding:
>
> Since [shadow#4] is the oldest shadow root, [span] is distributed to
> [shadow#4],
> [shadow#4] is distributed to [shadow#3], ....
> So I think, distribution is:
>
> [span] -> [shadow#4] -> [shadow#3] -> [shadow#2] -> [shadow#1]
Here's the "as-rendered" tree for you:
[#host]--[SR-4]->[style#a]
|
+->[shadow#4]
|
+->[SR-3]->[style#b]
|
+->[shadow#3]
|
[SR-2]->[style#c]
|
+->[shadow#2]
|
[SR-1]->[style#d]
|
+->[shadow#1]
|
+->[span]
>
> As the spec says "the styles of the shadow insertion point node are inherited
> by
> the child nodes of the shadow root of the shadow DOM subtree, distributed to
> this shadow insertion point",
> - [span] inherits the style of [shadow#4].
> - [shadow#4] inherits the style of [shadow#3],
> - [shadow#3] inherits the style of [shadow#2],
> - [shadow#2] inherits the style of [shadow#1].
The numbering is reversed, but yes.
>
> Shadow roots and insertion points don't have any styles (because they don't
> have any renderers).
Well, that's not necessarily true. Shadow Root doesn't have any styles, because
it's not an Element. However, insertion points are all elements, and they
totally could have styles. They are simply not rendered, but they certainly
should pass along the styles that are inherited by their contents.
This is sort of a whole new plane of thinking though, since we never had
anything like this before in CSS.
[span] will inherit from the style of the parent node of
> [shadow#1] (in this case, the style of the shadow host).
>
> Whether the style of the shadow host inherits to [span] depends on whether
> there are any reset-inheritance-flags in [shadow#1], [shadow#2], [shadow#3] and
> [shadow#4].
>
> Is this correct?
Yes! And I believe there's nothing in either Shadow DOM or CSS specs to suspect
otherwise. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Best regards,
> Takashi Sakamoto
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 22:04:01 UTC