- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:47:34 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-18796-2532-UEtb5PJc77@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18796
Art Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |art.barstow@nokia.com
--- Comment #1 from Art Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> ---
Karl - today Hixie closed related bug 15495
(https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15495). Does that fix
(http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7449&to=7450) address the issue
you raise in this bug (18796)?
FWIW, I agree it seems a bit strange to have what appears to be normative text
about code 204 in the non-normative Section 1 and that text does appear to
contradict what is said in Section 5 re all other codes not listed here must
cause the UA to fail the connection.
Hixie - should the information about code 204 in Section 1 be removed (as Karl
suggests)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:47:35 UTC